Ancient Israelites (Yah'Shir'Al) To Today!! How Who Became Who?
Mission To Israel:
"God's Covenant People: Yesterday Today and Forever" - Weiland
@TruthVids . I LOVE this exorcist, but he's wrong here because "goy" only translates from paleo into "of the seed," with the definite article. And "gentile" only translates from "gentilis," which is Latin, which translates to "from the genitals," again with the definite article. Plus, the fact that every instance of the word "brother" in the New Testament translates from "adelphos," which is Greek, which translates to "brother of the same womb." Meaning that all of the Aryan gentiles of Europe that the epistles are written to and that the 12 Apostles wild have been seeking out are factually genetic Israelites dispersed and/or in exile; as seen in "appollumi," which is also Greek, which translates properly to "exiled," not "lost" - as in, "I have been sent only to the exiled sheep of the house of Israel." -Christ Yah'Shua.
The modern day Joos are not Israelites, but Edomites. And genetic science proves this beyond doubt, as shown at https://t.me/edomisidumea .
Oh oh oh Oy Vey!
From personal research and reflections on the historical journey of the Ancient Israelites, it's fascinating to see how language, genetics, and historical context intersect to shape identities today. The terms "goy" and "gentile," often misunderstood, have distinct etymologies rooted in ancient languages—Hebrew and Latin respectively—that influence modern interpretations of ethnic and religious identity. Additionally, biblical words such as "adelphos" (brother of the same womb) and "appollumi" (exiled rather than lost) provide powerful insights into how the New Testament framed the relationship between early Christians and dispersed Israelite tribes. It's intriguing to consider that many of the European gentile populations addressed by the Apostles could well have genetic Israelite roots, highlighting a diaspora that traversed centuries and geographies. Modern genetic studies add another layer by examining populations traditionally associated with ancient Israel, challenging some long-held assumptions. The claim that contemporary Jewish groups may primarily descend from Edomites, for example, invites deeper exploration into historical migrations and genetic data. Maps depicting the spread of tribes like the Iberians, Scythians, and Cimmerians, alongside references to regions such as Ararat, the Caucasus, and parts of Europe, underscore the widespread movement and integration of Israelite descendants across Eurasia. This ongoing quest to understand ancestry isn’t just about tracing bloodlines but reconnecting with a cultural heritage that has shaped numerous modern identities. For anyone interested in history, theology, or genealogy, engaging with this narrative offers a meaningful perspective on who we are today and how our past continues to influence our present.
