Freedom chooses sides: damn him all day, but when he hits the garden back,

Freedom chooses sides: damn him all day, but when he gets back, he calls him libel.

Freedom is not a toy, and the more it is not a baton to arbitrarily slap others in the face.

But in Thai society today, we are seeing "freedom of certain groups" used on a side-by-side basis.

When you curse, abuse, slander, spin the tide - called honest criticism.

But when they were retaliated, they were sued back, they were accused of silencing the people.

A familiar image of society is the emergence of a "singer party" competing against a threat.

Claiming to be overrated. Discredited.

In the past, the same people

Used to use rude discourse with others that

"No criticism, no need."

Or as bad as "can't criticize, die."

This is not courage, but impaired maturity.

And it's a symptom of a society's severe lack of shame.

A common woe logic is

I can curse, but you can't sue.

Claims freedom of mouth but does not accept responsibility of speech.

When he was corrupted and prosecuted,

He was quick to play the victim, crying, accusing him of "threatening freedom."

If not swinging to find a splinter

If you don't want false news, false discourse to hurt other people,

Who's gonna get up and sue you?

More offensive than that is the "witch hunt" movement.

Freedom claims, but threatens people from home to work.

Drag his family to abuse

The mouth said to fight for rights.

But the act is to destroy the rights of others without remains.

My right is insults, abuse, harassment.

Her rights. None - if she dares to retaliate or sue back.

This is not democracy.

But it's thugs dominate the city in the St. Stain.

Some recent political cases further reinforce the difference in maturity.

One side chooses to churn out sneaky discourse, indicate identity to call out cheers.

The other side is still, not reduced to a war of saliva.

Not to sue, not to use the law as a weapon against people.

This is the difference between

Professional public figure

With an amateur who wants to stand out by cursing.

The important question is therefore not anyone louder.

But what kind of people deserve to run the country?

A man who uses freedom as a knife to stab someone else.

And then use the law as a shield to protect yourself.

Or people who understand that freedom comes with responsibility.

Democracy is not a unilateral right.

And good leaders must have the same standards as everyone.

It's not the Double Standard that exploits society.

Before choosing anyone

Try asking yourself well.

We want a country leader.

Or just a keyboard ringleader.

Let's sit through the budget from our taxes?

by: aekdon

https://news-wanmai.blogspot.com/2026/01/blog-post_18.html# Trending # News # Article # Thai politics # Case