Is The Night We Met literal rage bait? (Spoilers)

Having recently delved into Abby Jimenez's "The Night We Met," I found myself sharing some of the frustration echoed by many readers regarding character development. The book presents a love triangle involving Mike, Chris, and Larissa, but at times, the plot feels repetitive with characters seemingly stuck in a loop of excuses and misunderstandings. What I appreciated, though, was how the author tackled the emotional depth behind the characters, exploring themes of vulnerability and personal growth in a romantic setting. Despite moments where Mike's actions seemed foolish or Larissa's cluelessness was prominent, these traits added realism to their struggles rather than making them caricatures. From a personal perspective, the pacing could sometimes test patience, especially when the same conflicts resurfaced without significant progression. However, the story does offer heartfelt moments that balance the frustration, especially in scenes where Chris steps in to stabilize situations. Regarding the term "rage bait," it's understandable why some readers might feel provoked—repetition and slow development can trigger irritation, which might be intentional on Jimenez’s part to evoke strong reader emotions. If you prefer romantic novels with quick resolutions and straightforward character arcs, this might not be your cup of tea. In conclusion, while "The Night We Met" may feel exasperating at times due to recurring plot devices and character flaws, it's also a portrayal of imperfect people navigating love and life’s chaotic moments. For readers who enjoy character-driven stories with emotional complexity, it can still be a rewarding read. For those sensitive to perceived stagnation, this book might indeed feel like "rage bait."