I’m about to get Reale Active in this defense 🤣
I've noticed that skincare product launches, especially from popular influencers like Alix Earle, often attract criticism for supposedly lacking innovation or new ingredients. But from my experience working with skincare enthusiasts and researching product development, creating a new ingredient isn't as simple as it sounds. It requires enormous investment, rigorous testing, and regulatory approvals that can take well over a decade. What people sometimes overlook is that effective skincare can stem from well-formulated combinations of existing ingredients rather than brand-new compounds. For instance, blending proven actives in innovative ways or improving product delivery systems can yield impressive results without a novel ingredient. Additionally, the focus on "new" can distract from what's actually beneficial for skin health. Ingredients like hyaluronic acid, niacinamide, and retinoids have stood the test of time and continue to be staples in skincare because they work. Brands frequently build on these foundations, creating formulations that balance efficacy, safety, and sensory experience. From personal trials, I've found that consistent use of thoughtfully designed products often matters more than chasing the latest "breakthrough" ingredient. So, while flying cars or teleportation might be off the table, skincare advancements come in the form of smarter formulations, sustainability efforts, and transparent marketing. In short, criticism about lacking innovation should be tempered by understanding the realities of ingredient research and the value of established skincare science. Supporting launches like Alix Earle’s encourages diversity and evolution within the beauty industry, even if it’s more evolutionary than revolutionary.
















































































