Law vs Dharma: On the subject of "intent"
Intent Is the Heart: When Law Converges with Dharma
In the world of coexistence, "intent" is an important gauge that judges a person's actions, whether in a secular way that uses the law as a covenant or in a fair way that uses the law of karma as a basis. Both systems focus on what is in their heart before it becomes an "action."
1. Law: Intent is the offence element.
In law, the principle that "karma is a pointer of intent" means that the court will look at the actions that appear to diagnose the state of mind at the time, dividing the importance as follows:
- Criminal liability: A person shall be criminally liable if he has acted by "intent" (knowing the act and will to the result or foreseeing the result).
- Exceptions: If there is a lack of intent, such as an indefensible accident, or a miscarriage of fact, the penalty is diminished or not guilty at all, unless it is reckless that the law defines it as an offence.
- Objective: The law emphasizes maintaining social order. It therefore focuses on the external impact it has on others.
2. Dharma: Intent is karma.
In Buddhism, there is a Buddhist proverb, "Jetna Bhikkwe," which means "monks, we say that intent is karma."
- The dimension of the mind: Dharma goes deep to the root of the mind, although the action has not yet been accomplished, but if the mind has the intention of greed, anger, obsession, "karma" has already occurred in the mind of the doer.
- Resolution: Dharma prices the purity of the heart. Even if you do good things, if the intention is latent in jealousy, the result of karma will be clouded, unlike the law that may be seen as an orderly act.
- Objective: Focus on mind polishing and getting results consistent with mental state (motocross) for disengagement or intelligence.
3. Important differences
- Proof: The law requires tangible "testimony" to prove intent, but the law of karma has "true truth" as a judgment without relying on witnesses.
- Duration of effect: The law gives effect in this incarnation, through a course of justice that can be delayed or erroneous, but the law of karma acts automatically and continuously (resulting in both the present and the future).
- Recklessness: The law punishes recklessness if it causes serious damage, but in a fair way, recklessness (lack of consciousness) constitutes a spiritual defect, but may not constitute evil karma as severe as intentionally injuring others directly.
Conclusion
The law controls the "behavior" of society, not to encroach on each other, and the dharma controls the "mind," not to cause toxic intent. These two things promote each other. If a person has a dharma in his heart, a good intention, the law may not need to be used, because pure intent always brings peaceful action.































































































