A judge just ruled that Garth Brooks’ accuser cannot stay anonymous — her real name can now be used in the lawsuit. Do you think the court made the right call?
224 comments
See more comments
Related posts


Pop Base
0 likes


Lemon8er
0 likes


SpencerReviewsIt
144 likes


Erica | Conservative Mom
63 likes

Thunder Hoodie Post
1 like

trevorstevenson19
0 likes

Liliana -History
76 likes



Margarita
7118 likes


Michele Jeannette
2 likes

Ashley Thurman
392 likes

Progressivemomontheloose🤍
317 likes

JILL | Psychic Medium ✨️
166 likes



Blackbeltbabe
8 likes



Jane 🦧
823 likes


rickey lewis
6 likes


Lemon8er
0 likes


George Mansour
0 likes

unapologetic
11 likes

Jeff Brantley737
1 like

Liliana -History
1 like

trevorstevenson19
1 like


Troy Allen
6 likes


The Law Says What?!
25 likes

YM MOVIE
2 likes

slicksings1
0 likes

Unfugginbelievable
0 likes

jordanamplifies
0 likes


When Soap Ruled The Earth✅
0 likes


Lemon8er
31 likes


Alena USA Immigration Lawyer
0 likes


Lemon8er
0 likes

EROS ENTERTAINMENT 2023
2 likes

The Real Yvette Rants
1 like

jordanamplifies
2 likes


BROKENNLOVE
5 likes



Bianca Smith
60 likes


I'd he has to be named in court, he gets the chance to face his accuser. That's the law.