In my experience as a trader, one of the most common mistakes is relying on fair value gaps (FVGs) that don’t provide reliable signals. Fair value gaps represent areas where price movements have left behind unfilled trades, often indicating potential future price action zones. However, simply spotting any gap isn’t enough — the challenge lies in discerning which ones truly matter. From my daily trading routine, I focus on confirming fair value gaps with higher time frame context. For example, a gap that aligns with major support or resistance levels on a 4-hour or daily chart is more trustworthy. Also, observing how price reacts when it revisits the gap gives clues: a strong rejection near the gap suggests it’s significant. I’ve found that many traders fail because they pick gaps formed from low volume or noise during consolidation phases. To avoid this pitfall, I prioritize gaps occurring after strong trending moves or notable news events, as these carry more weight. Moreover, combining FVGs with other technical tools like volume profile, order flow analysis, or liquidity pools enhances the accuracy of predictions. This holistic approach reduces the chance of false signals which often lead to losses. In trading, patience is key. Instead of jumping into every detected gap, waiting for confirmation—such as candlestick patterns or momentum shifts—often results in better entries. Throughout my trading journey, mastering the identification of the right fair value gaps has boosted my confidence and profitability tremendously. Remember, fair value gaps are just one piece of the puzzle. Integrating them into a well-rounded trading strategy and continuously refining your approach based on real market behavior is essential for long-term success.