5 June 69
Aim for back taxes! "The Permanent Secretary" confirmed that the parents were disqualified from the "welfare card" because the child used the tax deduction name to appeal. If the child did not raise the parent, the parent received the welfare patent back, but the child lost the tax deduction, the tax deduction could be reviewed retroactively.
On June 5 Nov 69, the Permanent Secretary of the Treasury, revealed in an opposition case questioning the appropriateness of a new round of state welfare card registration guidelines that says that parents whose children take their names for income tax relief will disqualify, which may punish those who take care of their parents that this round of state welfare patent review aims to send assistance to those who truly lack caregivers. What the Treasury and the government intend to do now is to provide assistance to the poorest group of people, no one cares, alone, so the group that holds the same welfare card and has children to take care of their parents' rights. The income tax deduction is confirmed that a person has a caregiver. This deduction is 30,000 baht per year, which is 2,500 baht per child per parent per month, which is more than 300 baht received by the government. This is the main consideration.
As for the issue of whether a child has deducted their parents' rights and does not care until they are disqualified from the state welfare card program, parents can appeal. It confirms that the Treasury has an information system that can check if the child has actually taken care of their parents. This is the most straightforward move. By considering the tax filing criteria of the past year, to not give anyone the opportunity to dress up the numbers to qualify for the program.
At the same time, the Ministry of Finance warns that cases where tax concessions are exercised without actually raising parents may network false information for tax benefit, where government agencies can now link databases and verify them more easily.
For those disqualified and deemed not to have been justified, such as in the case of a child exercising a tax deduction but not actually providing care, an appeal can be filed after the results of the rights review are announced on July 17, 2026, with an appeal open from July 18 until the end of July.
If the outcome of the appeal is factual, the elderly will receive the State Welfare Patent back, but the child will lose such tax deduction rights and may be retroactively reviewed by the Internal Revenue Service.
"Those who apply their parents' names to tax breaks for their personal benefit without actually caring not only for tax avoidance, but also for the loss of their parents" opportunities to access state welfare. "
The Permanent Secretary of the Treasury stated, "The IRS has now instructed the IRS to speed up the details of the tax cut figures, but it is believed that there will be very few people who fall out of the welfare card scheme from this threshold, looking that today it should be discussed whether this is right or wrong, not how many people will be cut out of this threshold. We are not talking here. The Treasury confirms the idea of what we think about this criterion. If we get the numbers from the IRS, it will know initially how many people will fall out of the scheme with this criterion, which is currently 13.18 million, and if the children voluntarily do not reduce their parents. Tax cuts, and the parents of this group qualify for the whole program, and the children who take their parents for tax and do not return to care, this is called "ungrateful children," and then take care of their parents. "
Recognizing that change has strong friction, of course, but wanting to talk to each other for a reason, and each person needs a different welfare from the government. If today we change clearly, the government can save the money it spends here. Because we have to admit that we don't have an unlimited budget, we have a limited budget, so the spending must be accurate, objective and transparent. Today we can, it is a good use of the land money. The dramatic issues. I would like to ask not to be dramatic. If people with children are already looking after, they want to exercise other rights that are more appropriate than the government is ready to take care of, especially those that may be. The government has certain care measures, depending on what kind of measures it is considering, agreeing that the Thai Aid Plus 60 / 40 program is very likely.
