17 June 69

"Chai Shanok" is happy, the opposition to the "TH-AI Passport Project" test, file now! Do not wait to start the refining project, have to see the proportion of suitability, let the joint minister be responsible for the policy level, do not provide procurement, is the duty of the public, confirm, check, is worth the whole state-people.

On 17 June 69, Chai Chok Chidchuk, Minister of Digital for Economic and Social Affairs, mentioned the case that the opposition would file a review of the TH-AI Passport project as soon as it was registered, that it could be filed without waiting for the project to start. The episode had the Permanent Secretary of DE and the relevant departments checked and found that it was correct in accordance with all regulations, so it was not a concern.

When asked if the opposition noted a scheme of this nature, if there is an error, the person responsible is the vassal. But in this scheme, the minister will be responsible as well. Mr Chai Shanok said that he must look at the relevant proportions. For himself, he came to see the policy delivery. Ready to review and hear more comments, even to conduct a public sector discussion. Introduce information to negotiate the public sector to ensure that the public sector benefits increase, the budget is used cost-effectively, and the project follows government policies. Other areas of concern must be the body involved in the process.

"I personally think the policy is that the minister cannot intervene in the procurement process and that the minister will take responsibility. I think this is something to look at as appropriate, but I confirm that however many doubts have been investigated and the civil servants involved have confirmed it, I am convinced as he confirmed," Mr Chai Chok said.

When asked if the opposition would come forward to review the project, it would be a pleasure. Mr Chai Chok said that it must be reviewed already and, thanks to the opposition, everything needs to be reviewed, but there is no way for the minister to know every step, every detail of the project, so he likes to have it reviewed so that every project is done effectively.

When asked if the past had been attacked on this issue, it was considered political or not. Mr Chai Shanok said that at first he thought it was the only political issue because it started with the question of whether the budget was worth it, whether it was a quality product. At this point, he saw that the product was quality and cost-effective. Finally, he was rocked to the question of TOR. When he saw that he was following regulations, he talked about the private sector, so he had to follow up, but also confirmed that the policy to confiscate the benefit of the public was currently in negotiations on the price to pay. If there were 5 million rights registered, but some people were not active, there was no need to pay. The $1,600 million budget thought that everything was going the way the state and people benefited, so it confirmed this.

When asked what the question was not wanting the minister to throw or push the burden on the vassals if they were responsible, Mr Chai Shanok said: "It is not to throw, we have a disproportionate responsibility." For the minister is to deliver policies and monitor that the projects that are done effectively follow government policy, reiterating that when the minister should not be involved in the procurement process, we should not be involved.