2 June 69
"Teng Nutpong" received criticism after the launch of "Surapon," the chairman of the strategic adviser, the BMA governor's team, said that despite their different political positions, today they adhere to the same approach as the "People's Party," and point out that they can create change, and must be open to people who have seen, revealed, knowledgeable, not anyway, just persuaded and opened their names.
On June 2, 69, at the Sri Neighborhood Market, Dusit District, Bangkok, Nutthong Pong, the leader of the People's Party, gave an interview to the launch of the People's Party, Dr. Surat, the former president of Thammasat University, sitting as chairman of the strategic adviser, the BMA governor's team.
Nutthong said that he understood the resonance of Dr. Surat's history or doubts about the political stance of the past, but he wanted to emphasize that the ultimate goal of the People's Party that we volunteered for politics was to create change, make the ultimate power in this country truly belong to the people, and to get to that goal, to accomplish that goal, we had to expand the coalition.
"It is undeniable that in the past we may have had people who had different opinions, each of them may have had a different position, but if we want to move forward, get the country out of the system, or the current political regime that says it is a blue regime with a monopoly, both state power, economic power, is inevitable, we need the cooperation or support of people who have seen it differently, but today he agrees with the democratic approach to making the country transparent, making the ultimate rule of the country truly connected to the people," Nutpong said.
Mr. Nutpong also said that Dr. Suraporn's position, he thought that he himself would like to clarify, if there is a chance that the past has been joined by the NCPO or other roles that have been criticized for being related to the dictatorship, would like to tell everyone that the People's Party still adheres to the principle that we are definitely on the side of democracy, we want to do political work to create change.
When asked why the People's Party chose Professor Surapol to be the Chairman of the Strategic Adviser, the BMA governor's team said that Professor Suraporn is a knowledgeable person, not suddenly. Today, we have previously approached Dr. Surapol and many others since the February 8 election, when we were going to form a people's government until the BMA governor's election. We also have many other management teams that we have approached that we see as the right talent.
However, Dr. Suraporn may have had a personal reason to clear the obligation, making it impossible to launch at the same time as the other management team, which is why Dr. Suraporn's name has just been released.
Asked about the confidence of the People's Party in the work of Professor Surat, General Nutpong said that he was personally confident in every administration team, both the BMA governor's candidate and his advisers, including the MP's team. All 50 people, 50 districts, believe that this kind of synergy brings together people with direct abilities to work, people who decide that the people's party's approach is the right approach, and people who have seen each other to work with us, so that they adhere to the same democratic process as us, to make public policies that benefit everyone as us, and they believe that they can best drive Bangkok's agenda.
Nutpong said, "I believe that the People's Party is another party in the country that is most open to all-party criticism, especially maybe it is a direct echo of the so-called cheers of the party. I want everyone to see our intentions to create change. We ourselves have to be open to those who may have seen it. Today he decided to stick to the same way as the party and pull those people together to create change."
āļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļīāļāļāļēāļĄāļāđāļēāļ§āđāļāļ§āļąāļāđāļāļīāļāļāļąāļ§ āļĻ.āļāļĢ.āļŠāļļāļĢāļāļĨ āļāļąāļāļāļĢāļĢāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļ āļāļ°āđāļŦāđāļāđāļāđāļ§āđāļēāļāļēāļĢāļĢāļ§āļĄāļāļąāļ§āļāļāļāļāļāļāļĩāđāđāļāļĒāļĄāļĩāļāļļāļāļĒāļ·āļāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļĄāļ·āļāļāļāđāļēāļāļāļąāļāļāļąāđāļ āđāļāđāļāļŠāļīāđāļāļŠāļ°āļāđāļāļāđāļŦāđāđāļŦāđāļāļāļķāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĒāļ·āļāļŦāļĒāļļāđāļāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđāļāļīāļāļĢāļąāļāļāļĩāđāļŠāļģāļāļąāļāđāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļĄāļ·āļāļāļĒāļļāļāđāļŦāļĄāđāļāļĢāļīāļ āđ āđāļāļāļēāļāļ°āļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļāļāļąāđāļ§āđāļ āđāļāļ·āđāļāļ§āđāļēāļĄāļļāļĄāļĄāļāļāļāļĩāđāļāļĢāļĢāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļāđāļāđāļāļĒāđāļģ āļāļ·āļ āļāļēāļĢāđāļāļīāļāđāļāļāļēāļŠāđāļŦāđāļāļāļāļĩāđāđāļāļĒāļāđāļēāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļŦāđāļāļāļąāļāđāļāđāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāđāļ§āļĄāļĄāļ·āļāđāļāļ·āđāļāđāļāđāļēāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđāļāļĩāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļ āļāļ·āļāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĢāđāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļĨāļĩāđāļĒāļāđāļāļĨāļāļāļĩāđāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāļĒāļ·āļāļāļĒāļđāđāļāļāļāļ·āđāļāļāļēāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļīāļāđāļāļĒāļāļĒāđāļēāļāđāļāđāļāļĢāļīāļ āđāļāđāļāļāđāļēāļ§āļāļĩāđāļŠāļāđāļŠāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļ°āļāđāļāļāļāļķāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļąāđāļāđāļāđāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļąāļāđāļāļĨāļ·āđāļāļāļāđāļĒāļāļēāļĒāļāļĩāđāļĄāļĩāļāļļāļāļāđāļēāļāđāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļāļāļĒāđāļēāļāļāļĢāļīāļāđāļ āļāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļĩāđ āļāļēāļĢāļāļĩāđāļāļĢāļĢāļāđāļĨāļ·āļāļāļāļāļāļĩāđāļĄāļĩāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāļāļĒāđāļēāļ āļĻ.āļāļĢ.āļŠāļļāļĢāļāļĨ āđāļāđāļēāļĄāļēāļāļąāđāļāļāļģāđāļŦāļāđāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļāļĩāđāļāļĢāļķāļāļĐāļēāļĒāļļāļāļāļĻāļēāļŠāļāļĢāđāļāļĩāļĄāļāļđāđāļ§āđāļēāļŊ āļāļāļĄ. āļāđāļŠāļĢāđāļēāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļāļ·āđāļāļĄāļąāđāļāđāļāđāļ§āđāļē āļāļĢāļ°āđāļāđāļāđāļĨāļ°āļāđāļĒāļāļēāļĒāļāļĩāđāļāļ°āļāļđāļāļāļĨāļąāļāļāļąāļāļāļ°āļāđāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļ§āļēāļāđāļāļāđāļĨāļ°āļĄāļĩāļĢāļēāļāļāļēāļāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāļāļĩāđāļāļąāļāđāļāļ āđāļĄāđāđāļāđāđāļāļĩāļĒāļāđāļāđāļāļēāļĢāđāļĄāļ·āļāļāđāļāļīāļāļŠāļąāļāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļāđ āļŠāđāļ§āļāļāļąāļ§āđāļāļĒāļāļīāļāļāļēāļĄāļāļĢāļĢāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļāđāļāļāđāļ§āļāļāđāļāļāļŦāļāđāļēāļāļĩāđ āļāļāļ§āđāļēāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļīāļāļĢāļąāļāļāļąāļāđāļŠāļĩāļĒāļāļ§āļīāļāļēāļĢāļāđāđāļĨāļ°āļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļŦāđāļāļāđāļēāļ āđāļāđāļāļāļĨāđāļāļŠāļģāļāļąāļāļāļĩāđāļāļģāđāļŦāđāļāļĢāļĢāļāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļāļāļĢāļąāļāļāļąāļ§āđāļĨāļ°āļāļāļāļŠāļāļāļāļāđāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļēāļāļŦāļ§āļąāļāļāļāļāļāļđāđāļāļāđāļāđāļāļĩāļĒāļīāđāļāļāļķāđāļ āđāļĨāļĒāļāļīāļāļ§āđāļēāļāļĢāļāļĩāļāļĩāđāļāđāđāļŦāļĄāļ·āļāļāļāļ°āļĒāļ·āļāļĒāļąāļāļāļīāļĻāļāļēāļāļāļąāđāļāđāļāļāđāļ§āļĒ āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļāļāļąāđāļ§āđāļāļāļĩāđāļŠāļāđāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļĨāļ·āļāļāļāļąāđāļāļāļđāđāļ§āđāļēāļŊ āļāļāļĄ.āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđāļĄāļ·āļāļāđāļāļĒ āļāļ·āļāđāļāđāļāļŠāļąāļāļāļēāļāļāļĩāđāļāļĩāļ§āđāļē āļāļĢāļĢāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļĄāļ·āļāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļĢāļāļāđāļāļīāļĄ āļĄāļāļāļŦāļēāđāļāļ§āļĢāđāļ§āļĄāļāļĩāđāļŦāļĨāļēāļāļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāđāļāļ·āđāļāļŠāļĢāđāļēāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļāļĨāļĩāđāļĒāļāđāļāļĨāļāļāļĩāđāļĄāļąāđāļāļāļāđāļĨāļ°āļĒāļąāđāļāļĒāļ·āļāļĄāļēāļāļāļķāđāļ āļāļēāļĢāļĒāļķāļāļĄāļąāđāļāđāļāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļāļĢāļ°āļāļēāļāļīāļāđāļāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļāļĢāđāļāđāļŠāļāļģāđāļŦāđāđāļĢāļēāļĄāļāļāđāļŦāđāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļŦāļ§āļąāļāđāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļĄāļ·āļāļāļāļāļāļāļēāļāļīāđāļāđāļāļąāļāđāļāļāļāļķāđāļ
