From my experience researching indigenous identities, it’s clear that the conversation about Black indigenous peoples is often oversimplified. Many people confuse racial identity with political and tribal affiliation. A key Supreme Court case, Morton v. Mancari (1974), provides essential clarity by ruling that classifications involving American Indians are political rather than racial. This distinction is critical because it affects legal protections, treaty rights, and cultural sovereignty. When a Black indigenous person is mistakenly classified purely by race, it risks erasing their political identity and disrupting tribal sovereignty. For example, courts or institutions that categorize someone as "Black" without recognizing their indigenous political affiliation might deny them access to tribal resources or undermine treaty rights guaranteed to sovereign tribal nations. Understanding this political classification is vital for appreciating the unique status of indigenous peoples in the United States. Tribes existed long before colonial borders and continue to function as sovereign entities. Black individuals who are part of these tribes hold a distinct identity that is legally and culturally recognized beyond racial categorization. In my work engaging with indigenous communities, I have seen how mislabeling can cause real harm, such as interfering with legal processes, healthcare access, and voting rights. Recognizing Black indigenous peoples as true indigenous individuals respects their ancestral ties and strengthens their cultural and political voices. This discussion also highlights the importance of education on tribal sovereignty, treaty rights, and the intersectionality of race and political identity. By fostering a deeper understanding, we can support the rights and recognition of Black indigenous peoples and honor their rightful place as original inhabitants of this land.