Hegemonizing beauty only benefits, you know

You can take the same person and show them to 10 different people and ask those people to read that person from 1 to 10 and each and every single one of those people will give you a different number because there’s a difference between online duty and beauty and the real world. In the real world thoughts did not change with the body response to.

3/15 Edited to

... Read moreFrom personal experience, I've noticed that the standards of beauty promoted online often feel restrictive and unrealistic compared to real-life interactions. For example, the 'Non Instagram Faces' movement encourages people to unlearn the algorithm-driven beauty ideals that dominate social media, which can create a more inclusive understanding of beauty. On day 9 of my personal exploration, I found that unlearning these imposed standards allowed me to appreciate diverse features rather than conforming to a narrow ideal. People’s perceptions vary so much because beauty is inherently subjective and deeply tied to individual cultural and personal contexts. Online metrics and ratings often reduce a complex human to a simple score, ignoring personality, expression, and depth. In real life, these attributes greatly influence how we perceive beauty. Engaging more with genuine human connections rather than algorithm-driven appearances helps foster self-acceptance and resilience against unrealistic beauty comparisons. Overall, recognizing the difference between online duty and real-world beauty responses can empower us all to challenge hegemonic norms and celebrate authentic diversity in appearance and identity.