In many discussions about sensitive topics like antisemitism, it's crucial to recognize who has the authority and experience to define what qualifies as antisemitic behavior. The perspective that only Jewish people can truly decide what is antisemitic comes from the idea that lived experience provides essential context and understanding that outsiders may not have. From my own experience in various discussions and community dialogues, I've noticed that this approach fosters more respectful and accurate conversations. When people who are not part of the Jewish community attempt to label or dismiss claims of antisemitism, it can lead to misunderstandings or the minimization of serious concerns. Conversely, centering Jewish voices helps ensure that the dialogue remains grounded in authentic experience and cultural nuance. This does not mean that those outside the community cannot support efforts to combat antisemitism. Allies play a vital role in amplifying voices and standing against hatred. However, recognizing boundaries in who defines terms ensures that responses to bigotry are sensitive and appropriate. It also highlights the importance of listening deeply to those affected, rather than imposing external judgments. In practical terms, this means that when encountering accusations or examples of antisemitism, the best approach is to engage with Jewish perspectives directly and respect their determination of what constitutes harm. This principle can extend to other contexts dealing with discrimination and marginalized identities as well—respecting lived experience as a guiding framework for understanding sensitive and complex issues.