Automatically translated.View original post

ðŸšĻ Poll points! More than half of Americans look "billionaire."

ðŸšĻ Poll points! More than half of Americans view "billionaire" as a Democratic threat? ðŸ’ļðŸ—ģïļ

When "money" is not just wealth but the "power" that determines the country's destiny...Recent research reveals an alarming figure. 53% of Americans believe that billionaires are a direct threat to democracy!

📉 Why do people worry? Not because of envy of riches, but because of "unverifiable power." ❌ Election intervention: The big donations that come with a special ticket, approach authority ❌ capitalist favorable law: State policies that may be distorted for 1% more people than most people ❌ powerless: When the voice of the general public is as loud as the voice of currency.

⚖ïļ Double-sided coin: Although the support side views the billionaire as an innovator and driver of the economy, on the other hand, when capital monopolies political power, the voice of the people weakens...

ðŸ”Ĩ Now the tide of demands in the US is aimed at "limiting contribution limits" and "creating transparent rules" to bring sovereignty back into the hands of the people.

ðŸĪ” What do you think if you look back at our house?..Do you think the "big capital group" has too much influence on politics?

This figure comes from a poll by The Harris Poll (released late 2025) that says "53% of Americans believe billionaires pose a threat to democracy" (where this figure is up from a year earlier to 7%).

The poll clearly indicates that the main concern is not personal wealth, but political Influence, which can determine the direction of the country above the average person, which matches the original content you provide.

Comments can be exchanged. 👇

# Politics # Democracy # Billionaires # WealthGap # Politics# Democracy # Disparity # Monopoly capital

2/8 Edited to

... Read moreāļˆāļēāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āļīāļ”āļ•āļēāļĄāļ‚āđˆāļēāļ§āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļ™āļŠāļŦāļĢāļąāļāļŊ āļœāļĄāđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ§āđˆāļēāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļĄāļŦāļēāđ€āļĻāļĢāļĐāļāļĩāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ āļąāļĒāļ„āļļāļāļ„āļēāļĄāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļ˜āļīāļ›āđ„āļ•āļĒāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āļˆāļąāļ‡āļĄāļēāļ āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļˆāļģāļ™āļ§āļ™āļĄāļēāļāļ–āļđāļāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āļœāļđāđ‰āļŠāļĄāļąāļ„āļĢ āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļ­āļ­āļāļ™āđ‚āļĒāļšāļēāļĒāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ­āļ·āđ‰āļ­āļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ—āļļāļ™āļŠāļ™āļŠāļąāđ‰āļ™āļŠāļđāļ‡ āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ„āļĄāđˆāļŠāļĄāļ”āļļāļĨāđƒāļ™āļ­āļģāļ™āļēāļˆāļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āđāļĨāļ°āļĨāļ”āļ—āļ­āļ™āđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļŠāļ™āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ›āļĨāļ‡āđ„āļ›āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĄāļēāļ āļœāļĄāđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ§āđˆāļēāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āļāļģāļŦāļ™āļ”āļ—āļīāļĻāļ—āļēāļ‡āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻ āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļēāļ§āļ­āđ€āļĄāļĢāļīāļāļąāļ™āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ„āļĢāļķāđˆāļ‡āļāļĨāļąāļ§āļ§āđˆāļēāļĄāļŦāļēāđ€āļĻāļĢāļĐāļāļĩāļˆāļ°āļšāļīāļ”āđ€āļšāļ·āļ­āļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļ˜āļīāļ›āđ„āļ•āļĒāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āļŠāļ°āļ—āđ‰āļ­āļ™āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ–āļķāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ§āđ‰āļ§āļēāļ‡āđƒāļˆāđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļŠāļ™āļ—āļļāļāļ„āļ™āđ„āļĄāđˆāđƒāļŠāđˆāđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļœāļđāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļ™āļ° āđƒāļ™āļĄāļļāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļœāļĄ āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļāļĢāđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļˆāļģāļāļąāļ”āļ§āļ‡āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļšāļĢāļīāļˆāļēāļ„āđ€āļĨāļ·āļ­āļāļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ›āļĢāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļŠāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļĄāļēāļ āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļ–āđˆāļ§āļ‡āļ”āļļāļĨāļ­āļģāļ™āļēāļˆāļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ—āļļāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļŠāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āļĩāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āļĢāļąāļāļĐāļēāđāļāđˆāļ™āđāļ—āđ‰āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļ˜āļīāļ›āđ„āļ•āļĒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ—āļļāļāđ€āļŠāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļĢāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļ—āđˆāļēāđ€āļ—āļĩāļĒāļĄāļāļąāļ™ āļ™āļ­āļāļˆāļēāļāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļŦāļēāļāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļĒāđ‰āļ­āļ™āļāļĨāļąāļšāļĄāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāđ„āļ—āļĒ āđ€āļĢāļēāļāđ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĄāļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļĨāļļāđˆāļĄāļ—āļļāļ™āđƒāļŦāļāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āļēāļˆāļĄāļĩāļ­āļīāļ—āļ˜āļīāļžāļĨāļ•āđˆāļ­āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™āļāļąāļ™ āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļāļĨāđ„āļāļ•āļĢāļ§āļˆāļŠāļ­āļšāđāļĨāļ°āļšāļēāļĨāļēāļ™āļ‹āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāđāļ‚āđ‡āļ‡āđāļāļĢāđˆāļ‡āļˆāļķāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļˆāļģāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĄāļ·āļ­āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļŠāļ–āļĩāļĒāļĢāļ āļēāļžāđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļĒāļ°āļĒāļēāļ§ āļ—āđ‰āļēāļĒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļļāļ”āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§ āđ€āļĢāļēāļ—āļļāļāļ„āļ™āļ„āļ§āļĢāļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļāļąāļ™āļ•āļĢāļ°āļŦāļ™āļąāļāļ–āļķāļ‡āļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļāļīāļ”āļˆāļēāļāļ­āļģāļ™āļēāļˆāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āđƒāļ™āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļ˜āļīāļ›āđ„āļ•āļĒ āļžāļĢāđ‰āļ­āļĄāļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļŠāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļāļēāļĢāļĄāļĩāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļŠāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ‚āļ›āļĢāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļŠ āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļ˜āļīāļ›āđ„āļ•āļĒāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđ€āļ•āļīāļšāđ‚āļ•āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļŠāļĄāļ”āļļāļĨāđāļĨāļ°āļĒāļąāđˆāļ‡āļĒāļ·āļ™āđƒāļ™āļ—āļļāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ—āļĻāļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ‚āļĨāļ