🔥 Meta Fight Back! 'Section 230' Request for Abolition of Historic Case Verdict, Teen Addiction Case, Social Addiction ⚖️📱

🔥 Meta Fight Back! Pry 'Section 230' Request for Abolition of Historic Case of Social Addiction Teen Case ⚖️📱

Many should remember the global case that has just rocked tech! When a Los Angeles court jury sentenced the social media giant to responsibility for a case in which its platform resulted in a teenage user's "addiction" to mental health, the court ordered Meta and Google to pay a combined $6 million (about $220 million) in damages. 💸

But the latest...The legal game is not over yet! 🚨

Meta has already applied to the court for the removal of the decision, removing a settler law like "Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996" as a shield against 🛡️, which normally protects online platforms from being responsible for the "content" that users post or create themselves.

🗣️ Meta argues: The court evidence suggests that Kaley G.M.'s mental health problems are linked to the "content" she chooses to watch, rather than to the "feature design" of the app itself, such as the Infinite scroll or the Autoplay system. 📲

On the Google side, it didn't wait; it filed a lawsuit asking the court to swipe down YouTube-related rulings or asking for another new trial as well. 🎬

Even in the past, many courts of first instance have often rejected claims of section 230 in cases involving this addiction, but if this time the court decides to hear it...This could become a "pivotal turning point" that will shape the future and new standards of other social media lawsuits awaiting consideration throughout the United States! 🇺🇸

What do friends think about this? Should social media be responsible for the design of platforms that attract users? Comments can exchange ideas. 👇

# deepkub # metalawsuits # socialmediaaddiction # section 230 # landmarkverdict# IT News # Technology Update # Social Media