Stop using ai for everything

Generative ai is bad for the environment and for artists. Try to use it as little as possible.

2025/11/10 Edited to

... Read moreGenerative AI technology has revolutionized the way people create content, but it comes with hidden costs that often go unnoticed. One major issue is its environmental footprint. The computational power required to train and run AI models consumes significant energy, contributing to carbon emissions and climate change. This environmental cost urges us to reconsider frequent and excessive use of AI tools. Additionally, the rise of AI-generated art raises concerns in the creative community. While AI tools can produce impressive images in minutes, this often diminishes the value of human creativity and unique artistic expression. The image text 'Idiathaihioamgta cando you it yourself. Drawityourself instead ofplugginginto chatgpt.' highlights this perspective, encouraging individuals to engage in the personal act of drawing rather than relying solely on AI outputs. Creating art by hand, as noted by the comment 'Idrew this in15 minutes. and it looks just as cute! w,' emphasizes that manual creativity can be both fulfilling and effective. Not only does this practice reduce dependence on AI, but it also nurtures skill development and genuine artistic satisfaction. Embracing traditional methods supports artists and fosters originality, which is invaluable in a digital world frequently dominated by automated content generation. In summary, while AI remains a powerful tool for creativity and productivity, it is important to be mindful of its environmental impact and effects on artistic integrity. Striking a balance—using AI thoughtfully without over-dependence—helps protect the planet and preserves the intrinsic joy and authenticity found in human-created art.