Engaging in a First Amendment audit often involves testing the public's right to film in government or public spaces, which can sometimes lead to confrontations. I remember a recent instance where while recording at a public facility, the staff expressed clear discomfort and verbally asked us to leave, saying, "They don't want you here!" This reaction, albeit common, underscores the tension between citizens exercising their rights and the reluctance of some officials or employees to be recorded. From my experience, the key in these situations is to remain calm and polite while firmly knowing your rights. Documenting everything respectfully can be a powerful tool for transparency, yet it’s equally important to de-escalate potential conflicts. Many auditors recommend informing the people that filming in public spaces is legal and part of constitutional protections, specifically the First Amendment. Moreover, engaging with the audience through hashtags like #FirstAmendmentAudit and #AuditingAmerica helps connect experiences and educate others about these rights. Despite the encounters with hostility, such activism drives awareness and accountability. However, auditors should always be prepared for such hostile responses and ensure they are well-versed in the legal boundaries of recording in public. This preparation not only protects the auditor but also reinforces the legitimacy of their efforts to uphold constitutional freedoms. Understanding the legal landscape, practicing respectful communication, and sharing these experiences collectively empower citizens to audit effectively and responsibly. This kind of grassroots engagement is vital in promoting transparency and protecting individual rights in public spaces.