From following these developments closely, I've noticed that diplomatic dialogues between the US and Iran have always been complex and often shrouded in conflicting narratives. Trump's mention of discussions led by Presidential Envoy Wittkopf and Kushner points to backchannel communications that sometimes differ from official state statements. In past negotiations, infrastructure and intelligence operations have played crucial roles in shaping dialogue outcomes. The US disrupting Iranian infrastructure likely complicates not only Iran's data collection but also its political signaling, which may lead to denials or mixed messages from Tehran. It's interesting how such talks, even if unofficial or secretive, indicate progress towards resolving tensions that have long impacted regional and global stability. While Iran's outright denial in Islamabad adds another layer of political strategy, these revelations suggest that subtle, behind-the-scenes diplomacy is ongoing despite public posture. For those following US-Iran relations, these insights reveal the nuances beyond typical headlines, highlighting how both sides manage information wars alongside genuine negotiation efforts. This makes tracking credible sources and official confirmations all the more important for understanding the real status of international talks.