Replying to @draaavennoxus it’s not common sense to be able to spot propaganda when you’ve been propagandized your whole life #leftist #marxist #socialist #communist
For years, when I heard the word 'propaganda,' my mind immediately jumped to images of wartime posters with exaggerated, evil caricatures. I pictured blatant lies and overt demonization, thinking it was always easy to spot if you just paid attention. But through my own journey of questioning and learning, I've realized how much more subtle and pervasive it truly is, often defying those simplistic definitions. One of the biggest eye-openers for me was realizing that propaganda doesn't always involve demonizing an enemy. In fact, some of the most effective propaganda works by creating a sense of unity, pride, or even positive national identity. Think about phrases like 'US exceptionalism' – something I heard often, even from a young age. It’s presented not as a lie, but as a source of inherent goodness, making it incredibly hard to question. This kind of positive framing, while not inherently 'evil,' still shapes our perceptions in a specific, intended direction, often limiting our critical view of our own systems or history. It's also true that propaganda is often targeted toward specific groups, tailored to resonate with their values and fears. A message aimed at a certain demographic might focus on economic stability, while another for a different group might emphasize social justice, both designed to elicit a desired response. This isn't just about politics; it infiltrates advertising and public health campaigns too, showing how it can carry either a negative or positive connotation depending on its goal and audience. And often, propaganda doesn't come in the form of bold-faced lies. Instead, it relies on selective truths, omissions, or framing issues in a way that guides your interpretation. The 'mainstream media sources' like MSNBC, FOX, or CNN, as the original discussion points out, are often seen as 'irrefutable.' But what's not said, or how a story is framed, can be just as powerful as an outright fabrication. It's a 'long term process of socialization,' where consistent exposure shapes what feels 'normal' and 'true.' I remember standing for the 'Pledge of Allegiance' every day in 'kindergarten' and beyond. At the time, it felt completely natural – a patriotic ritual. I realize now that this is part of that 'systematic socialization' that teaches us a certain worldview from a very early age. It’s not about malicious intent in every instance, but about a consistent narrative that shapes how we perceive our nation, its role in the world, and even what we consider 'common sense.' Breaking free from these deeply entrenched narratives isn't automatic; it requires conscious effort and a willingness to question everything we've been taught to accept. So, when faced with questions like 'what is not true about propaganda?' it’s tempting to look for simple answers. But the reality is far more complex. It's rarely black and white 'good vs. evil.' Understanding that propaganda can be positive, subtle, and a product of lifelong conditioning has been crucial for me in developing a more discerning eye. It’s an ongoing process, but recognizing these nuances is the first step toward reclaiming our own critical thought.

Kids aren't being taught US exceptionalism anymore. Or at least not to the degree they used to. Just take a visit to any highschool US history class. Even in my red state and with my MAGA teacher he taught us both the context in which Americas actions were seen as great, but also why they're seen as immoral or wrong today.