🏈Why wasn’t Sherrone Moore mistress fired 🏈

Okay, besties, can we seriously talk about the Sherrone Moore situation at Michigan? I've been following this closely, and honestly, I'm still trying to wrap my head around it all. It’s one thing for a coach to face severe consequences for an alleged inappropriate relationship and subsequent legal issues – being fired, then arrested for home invasion, stalking, and breaking & entering, with GPS monitoring and mandated mental health treatment? That’s incredibly serious. But what really sticks with me, and what I see everyone asking about, is the alleged “mistress” – the blonde woman pictured in some of the news reports – who, according to TMZ Sports headlines I've seen, is *still employed by Michigan*. This is where things get really murky for me. If the university deemed Moore's actions grounds for immediate termination “with cause” due to violating policy, how can the other party involved seemingly walk away without similar repercussions from their employer? I've been trying to think through the possible reasons, and it's complicated. Could it be that her role within the university had different policy parameters? Perhaps her actions, while related to the alleged inappropriate relationship, didn't directly violate her specific employment contract or university policies in the same way Moore's did as a head coach. Or maybe the university is trying to avoid a potential wrongful termination lawsuit from her side, which could be an even bigger headache. It's also possible that the 'violation of university policy related to an inappropriate relationship' was primarily on Moore's side, especially if there was a power dynamic at play that he, as a superior, was expected to uphold more strictly. The OCR results even mentioned that Sherrone Moore's Michigan football players feel 'betrayed.' I can only imagine the locker room atmosphere and how this saga impacts team morale and future recruiting. It's not just about the individuals involved; it's about the integrity of the entire program. When players see such a stark difference in consequences, it has to raise questions about fairness and leadership at the top. This whole incident really puts a spotlight on accountability, not just in college sports but in any workplace. It's not always black and white, and there are so many layers, from HR policies and legal implications to public perception and the emotional toll on everyone involved. It makes me wonder if Michigan could have been more transparent or consistent in their approach to both individuals. What do you all think? Is it fair, or is there a double standard at play here?