The American justice system has long been criticized for its flaws, especially when it comes to ensuring fair trials for defendants. One critical issue highlighted by many advocates is the use of coercion rather than genuine judicial processes. Many defendants face immense pressure to accept plea bargains because going to trial can lead to significantly harsher sentences—sometimes over 50% longer—simply as a penalty for exercising their right to a trial. This coercion is not merely anecdotal but is rooted in systemic practices that disadvantage those who cannot afford extensive legal battles or are mentally and physically exhausted by prolonged legal proceedings. Defendants often plead guilty not because they are guilty, but because the risk of a trial is too great. This creates a justice system that resembles negotiation under duress rather than fair adjudication. Furthermore, the hashtag #brokenjusticesystem reflects widespread concerns about structural problems such as racial biases, inadequate public defense, and an overburdened court system. These challenges contribute to the perception and reality of unfairness in trials across America. For anyone interested in understanding why the justice system struggles with fairness, it is vital to recognize these underlying issues. The combination of coercion, the threat of longer sentences, and systemic inequalities means that many individuals do not receive the fair trial guaranteed under the Constitution. Raising awareness and supporting reforms aimed at transparency, better defense resources, and fair sentencing guidelines are crucial steps toward restoring trust and justice in American courts.