Automatically translated.View original post

ðŸ“Đ"Send an email, do not accept the new hiring condition... but still go to work.

Is the court really willing? "

Have you ever?

The employee said, "No."

Send a clear objection email.

But finally,

👉 to work as usual

👉. Get paid on new terms.

👉 been quiet for months.

The question is,

Is this... still considered non-consensual?

Or in the eyes of the court, "deemed acceptable." 😐

This case has an answer from the Court of Appeal.

📖

The story is...

✈ïļ airline company.

Let's change the pilot schedule.

From

➡ïļ Do 21 days / 21 days off

Is

➡ïļ Do 20 days / 10 days off

(Holidays are reduced, but give 10% more money)

ðŸ‘Ļ‍✈ïļ The pilot didn't agree.

So send a written objection email

But after that, what happened?

🔍 important behavior that the court views.

Despite "objections with emails," in fact, the pilot

✅ to work on the new schedule.

✅ Get a salary + 10% more money

✅ doing this for seven months.

✅ Not suing, not reclaiming, not taking more legal action.

⚖ïļ What did the court decide?

Court of Appeals for Special Prerogative Cases, dismissed.

The key reason is

📌 Acting behavior is more important than email speech.

Even at first refused.

But that

👉. Keep working.

👉 Get new benefits.

👉 for months.

The court held that

"Accept the new hiring condition implicitly."

The email objected at an early date.

So I lost legal weight.

ðŸ’Ą Lessons for entrepreneurs

â€Ē ❗ Changing employment conditions that are not you. Be very careful.

â€Ē 🧠 But if the employee "doesn't speak"

But "continue. Get paid. Long silence."

This behavior may be interpreted as acceptable.

â€Ē 📄 is the safest.

Make a clear written agreement from the beginning.

📌. Source.

Judgment of the Court of Appeal for Special Nos. 1558 / 2567

👉 Important note

This content is a general provision of information.

Not case-specific legal counsel.

Each case fact can be different.

âĢ âĢ âĢ âĢ âĢ âĢ âĢ âĢ âĢ ⚡ ⚡

📊 A "clear from the beginning" backyard job system reduces the problem later.

Many labor cases.

Didn't lose because of intent

But lost because the time information / schedule / evidence was unclear.

If you want

â€Ē In-out time Verifiable

â€Ē Backward schedule is not confusing

â€Ē Information available when disputed

👉 See details.

🌐 /

Finger Scanner & Front Scan

With a Digitalscan payroll program.

✅ Paid once.

✅. No monthly.

✅ suits entrepreneurs who want to "control themselves."

ðŸ“ē Line. Free consultation.

@ digitalscan → https://lin.ee/2cYeMwI

Willing to help think before the problem arises. 🙂

# Labour law

# The owner must know

# Run people to survive

# Labour cases from the courts

# Staff time system

1/29 Edited to

... Read moreāļˆāļēāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļŠāđˆāļ§āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§ āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđāļ›āļĨāļ‡āļŠāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĒāļīāļ™āļĒāļ­āļĄāļˆāļēāļāļĨāļđāļāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™ āļ­āļēāļˆāļāđˆāļ­āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļžāļīāļžāļēāļ—āđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļąāļšāļŠāļ™āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ‡āđˆāļēāļĒ āđāļĄāđ‰āļĨāļđāļāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ‡āļ­āļĩāđ€āļĄāļĨāļ„āļąāļ”āļ„āđ‰āļēāļ™āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĨāļēāļĒāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āđŒāļ­āļąāļāļĐāļĢ āđāļ•āđˆāļ–āđ‰āļēāļŦāļēāļāļĨāļđāļāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļĒāļąāļ‡āļ„āļ‡āļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ•āļēāļĄāļŠāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāđāļĨāļ°āļĢāļąāļšāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āļ•āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‡āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āđ„āļ‚āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāļ•āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļāļīāļ™āļĢāļ°āļĒāļ°āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡ āļĻāļēāļĨāļĄāļąāļāļˆāļ°āļ•āļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ§āđˆāļēāļĨāļđāļāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļĒāļ­āļĄāļĢāļąāļšāđ€āļ‡āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ™āđ„āļ‚āļāļēāļĢāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™āļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ›āļĢāļīāļĒāļēāļĒ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļˆāļēāļāļ„āļ”āļĩāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĒāļāļ•āļąāļ§āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļšāļ—āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄ āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™āļ§āđˆāļēāļžāļĪāļ•āļīāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļĨāļđāļāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ›āļāļīāļšāļąāļ•āļīāļ•āļēāļĄāļ•āļēāļĢāļēāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāđāļĨāļ°āļĒāļąāļ‡āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļĢāļąāļšāļ„āđˆāļēāļ•āļ­āļšāđāļ—āļ™āđ€āļžāļīāđˆāļĄāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĻāļēāļĨāļ­āļļāļ—āļ˜āļĢāļ“āđŒāļ„āļ”āļĩāļŠāļģāļ™āļąāļāļžāļīāđ€āļĻāļĐāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļ§āđˆāļēāļāļēāļĢāļŠāđˆāļ‡āļ­āļĩāđ€āļĄāļĨāļ„āļąāļ”āļ„āđ‰āļēāļ™āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļœāļĨāļœāļđāļāļžāļąāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļžāļ­āļ—āļĩāđˆāļˆāļ°āļĒāļ·āļ™āļĒāļąāļ™āļ§āđˆāļēāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĒāļ­āļĄāļĢāļąāļšāļŠāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆ āļ”āļąāļ‡āļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™ āđ€āļ­āļāļŠāļēāļĢāļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ•āļāļĨāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļĨāļēāļĒāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āđŒāļ­āļąāļāļĐāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđāļ•āđˆāļ•āđ‰āļ™āļˆāļķāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ›āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļ™āļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļžāļīāļžāļēāļ—āđƒāļ™āļ­āļ™āļēāļ„āļ• āđāļ™āļ°āļ™āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļīāļˆāļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļĢāļ°āļšāļšāļšāļąāļ™āļ—āļķāļāđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāļ—āļģāļ‡āļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ‚āļ›āļĢāđˆāļ‡āđƒāļŠ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ„āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļŠāđāļāļ™āļ™āļīāđ‰āļ§āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļŠāđāļāļ™āļŦāļ™āđ‰āļē āļžāļĢāđ‰āļ­āļĄāđ‚āļ›āļĢāđāļāļĢāļĄāđ€āļ‡āļīāļ™āđ€āļ”āļ·āļ­āļ™ āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļāđ‡āļšāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļĄāļđāļĨāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļēāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđāļ›āļĨāļ‡āļŠāļ āļēāļžāļāļēāļĢāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļĨāļ”āļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āđ‚āļ•āđ‰āđāļĒāđ‰āļ‡āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļŠāļĢāļīāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĄāļąāđˆāļ™āđƒāļˆāđƒāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļāļŽāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ‚āļąāļ”āđāļĒāđ‰āļ‡āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ āļ™āļ­āļāļˆāļēāļāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāļēāļĢāļāļąāļšāļĨāļđāļāļˆāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļŠāļąāļ”āđ€āļˆāļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļ•āđˆāļ­āđ€āļ™āļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ—āļģāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāđāļĨāļ°āļˆāļąāļ”āļ—āļģāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ•āļāļĨāļ‡āļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄāļāļąāļ™āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ­āļĩāļāđāļ™āļ§āļ—āļēāļ‡āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļŦāļĨāļĩāļāđ€āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļąāļāļŦāļēāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āđāļĢāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™āđƒāļ™āļ­āļ‡āļ„āđŒāļāļĢāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļ”āļĩ