Venezuela condemns the United States’ declaration that the airspace above and around Venezuela be considered “closed in its entirety,” calling the move a “colonialist threat” to its sovereignty and a violation of international law.
The government says the U.S. statement amounts to “extraterritorial jurisdiction,” a threat to Venezuela’s territorial integrity, aeronautical security and full sovereignty.
It rejects any interference, saying the closure is an illegal, unjustified aggression against Venezuelan people and demands the international community condemn it.
Venezuelan authorities note that under the 1944 Chicago Convention each state has exclusive rights over its airspace, and they will not accept foreign orders or threats.
The announcement comes amid heightened U.S. military activity in the region and a series of U.S. strikes on vessels accused of drug trafficking, which Caracas strongly opposes.
Caracas also revoked operating rights for several international airlines that suspended flights to avoid the declared closed airspace a step that underscores how deeply Venezuela rejects the U.S. move.
The government frames the entire situation as a matter of national dignity, sovereignty, and lawful resistance to what it sees as U.S. aggression.
... Read moreThe recent declaration by the United States that the airspace above and around Venezuela is "closed in its entirety" has sparked significant controversy, drawing strong condemnation from Venezuelan authorities. This move is seen by Venezuela as a blatant infringement on its national sovereignty and an example of extraterritorial jurisdiction that disregards international law, specifically the protections set out in the 1944 Chicago Convention, which grants countries exclusive control over their airspace.
Venezuela’s firm rejection highlights their view that the US action is an unjustified act of aggression aimed at undermining the country’s territorial integrity and aeronautical security. By declaring the airspace closed, the US effectively restricts international flights and signals a readiness to interfere with Venezuelan air traffic, which Caracas interprets as a continuation of colonialist practices threatening their sovereign rights.
This situation unfolds amid heightened US military activity in Latin America and increased operations targeting vessels allegedly involved in drug trafficking, which Venezuela opposes strongly. The conflict also led Venezuela to revoke operating permissions for various international airlines that canceled flights to avoid the airspace, signaling the deepening rift between Venezuela and the US.
The Venezuelan government has called upon the international community to condemn the US action, emphasizing that airspace sovereignty is a fundamental aspect of national dignity and lawful resistance to foreign intervention. Experts note that international aviation laws prioritize respect for state sovereignty, and violations such as these risk escalating tensions in the region.
For observers and stakeholders in international aviation and geopolitics, this dispute illustrates the complex interplay between national sovereignty, international law, and geopolitical power struggles. Understanding these principles is crucial for interpreting ongoing developments in Venezuelan-US relations and their broader implications for regional stability and global norms governing airspace control.