Shopping with health-focused apps like Yuka is an enlightening experience, but it's important to recognize the barriers many consumers face. Yuka evaluates food and cosmetic products based on their ingredients, nutritional quality, and impact on health, helping users make informed choices. However, this valuable tool is not accessible to everyone, whether due to economic constraints, lack of product availability, or technological barriers such as smartphone access. Moreover, many popular products commonly found in supermarkets receive low scores on the Yuka app, which can be discouraging. For example, items considered convenient or affordable often contain additives or ingredients flagged by Yuka’s algorithm, which rates products poorly for health reasons. This gap between what is readily available and what is recommended highlights the privilege involved in shopping solely based on Yuka’s ratings. Consumers reliant on budget-friendly options might find it costly or impractical to avoid products with lower Yuka scores, pointing to a broader issue of food equity. Additionally, regional differences affect product availability and the breadth of Yuka’s database, limiting the app’s usefulness in some areas. For those who do use Yuka, the experience can foster healthier habits and encourage more conscious consumption. However, integrating Yuka ratings with personal needs, budget, and local availability remains a challenge. Thus, while Yuka promotes transparency and healthier choices, it also spotlights socio-economic and accessibility issues within the realm of food and product shopping.