Book icks: Cover edition

I hate these cartoon looking covers😭 I know some ppl hate when real people are on the cover and I just hate any people on the cover. Especially if they are being intimate on the cover. I can’t just pull that out to read in a public space. I like what I’m reading to be a secret to myself. If they kissing on the cover and depending on the suggestiveness of the title they can assume what lies beyond the front and that’s embarrassing 😭😩

Plus to me they look very 2 dimensional and blah like it’s for kids idk. I don’t like the art style it’s giving “sims 4 latest art styles for packs” IKYKY and I don’t like it😂 I want actual ART on the front. Like sumn that is vague but if you read the book it makes sense.

I like to imagine the characters myself I don’t want it ruined with the actual image of what they supposedly look like.

#bookicks #booktokbooks #lemon8bookclub

2025/1/2 Edited to

... Read moreIt’s funny how something as simple as a book cover can spark such strong opinions, right? My recent post about my 'book cover icks' really got me thinking, especially about the explosion of cartoon covers in the romance genre. You see them everywhere now – books like 'Not in Love,' 'The Love Hypothesis,' 'Daydream,' and 'Icebreaker' all sport this popular style. And while I completely get that aesthetics are subjective, for me, and I know for many others, these covers just don't hit the mark. My biggest 'ick', as I mentioned, is the public embarrassment factor. It’s one thing to read a steamy romance privately, but trying to enjoy a book with a cartoon couple passionately embracing on the front cover while on a train or in a coffee shop? It just feels… exposed. I appreciate my reading choices being a bit more discreet. It’s not about shame, but about personal space and the freedom to get lost in a story without feeling like I’m broadcasting its genre to everyone around me. Beyond that, there's the artistic side. Many of these cartoon covers, while colorful, can feel a bit generic or two-dimensional. They often depict characters in a very specific way, which, for me, robs me of the joy of imagining the characters in my own mind. Part of the magic of reading is building that world and those faces in your head. When a cover presents a fully formed, often simplified, illustration, it can feel like that imaginative process is short-circuited. I crave covers that offer a hint, a mood, or an abstract representation that still leaves room for personal interpretation – something truly artistic, as opposed to what sometimes feels like a template. I often wonder why this trend became so prevalent. Publishers might be aiming for a broader appeal, thinking these bright, often humorous illustrations attract a wider audience, especially on platforms like BookTok. They can be eye-catching and convey a lighthearted tone, which is perfect for some rom-coms. However, when applied to books with deeper, more emotional or even spicier themes, there can be a disconnect between the cover and the content, which can be a bit jarring. So, what's a reader to do if they share this 'ick'? For starters, don't feel alone! There are plenty of us who prefer different cover styles. When browsing for new reads, try looking for books from publishers known for more traditional or artistic covers. Many indie authors also commission incredibly diverse and unique artwork. Using an e-reader can also be a game-changer; you can read whatever you want without anyone seeing the cover art. Or, if you find a book you love with a cartoon cover, consider buying an alternate edition if one exists, or even getting a plain sleeve for your physical copy. Ultimately, reading should be an enjoyable escape, and a cover shouldn't detract from that experience. What are your hacks for dealing with book covers you're not a fan of?

11 comments

Justine Laraia's images
Justine Laraia

I hate cartoon and real people on books! Just give me a nice background with an “if you know, you know” kind of vibe.