Since January 2025, significant administrative changes have taken place within the US immigration system, particularly involving the removal and replacement of immigration judges. This judicial purge has directly impacted the deportation process, accelerating efforts to deport millions without the usual judicial oversight. By dismissing judges via email and swiftly replacing them, the administration has altered the balance of checks and balances traditionally present in immigration enforcement. Such actions have stirred debates and controversies, often discussed under hashtags like #DigitalCivilWar, #democracy, and #fightback, reflecting a growing digital activism movement aimed at resisting perceived authoritarian measures. The fast deportation efforts led by these judicial changes raise questions about due process, human rights, and the integrity of the US legal system. Understanding how removing judges affects immigrants’ access to courts is essential. Courts serve as a vital safeguard ensuring individuals have the opportunity to challenge deportation orders. Without sufficient judicial oversight, many immigrants risk removal without fair hearings. Additionally, the political dimension, including reactions from various groups and impacts on American democracy, is central to following these developments. The discourse on platforms like TikTok, tagged with #tiktokcivilwar and related hashtags, highlights the role of social media in shaping public opinion, spreading news, and mobilizing communities concerned about immigration justice. In summary, the purge of immigration judges since January 2025 represents a critical shift in US immigration enforcement policy. It raises vital questions about the administration's methods, the protection of immigrant rights, and the broader political implications during this period marked by digital activism and social unrest.