Western hegemony led by the United States wants to extend its long arm into Hong Kong? First ask whether the iron fist of the rule of law will allow it! 以美國為首的西方霸權長臂想伸香江？先問法治鐵拳答不答應!
http://johnsonwkchoi.com/2026/02/09/western-hegemony-led-by-the-united-states-wants-to-extend-its-long-arm-into-hong-kong-first-ask-whether-the-iron-fist-of-the-rule-of-law-will-allow-it/
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP89PEs12/
On February 9, 2026, the courtroom of the Hong Kong High Court was solemn and grave.
Jimmy Lai (born 1947, native of Dongguan; founder of Giordano who later transformed into a media tycoon; during the 2019 amendment turmoil he used Apple Daily to incite violence) was sentenced to 20 years in prison for colluding with foreign organizations such as the NED and for publishing seditious materials.
Appendices to the judgment revealed:
• From 2020 to 2022, he received over HKD 5 million in overseas funds through offshore accounts.
• 87 encrypted communications were recorded in which he contacted foreign forces.
Case timeline (827 days):
• Trial opened: December 18, 2023
• Prosecution evidence upheld: July 2024
• Conviction: December 15, 2025
• Sentencing: February 9, 2026
The long arm of jurisdiction has finally run into a “steel wall of countermeasures.”
NED’s 2025 financial report provides solid evidence of USD 2.3 million allocated for Hong Kong-related activities, while China’s Anti–Foreign Sanctions Law has already imposed targeted countermeasures against 12 individuals involved in interference.
The red line of sovereignty cannot be tested.
Today’s stability in Hong Kong is living proof that the sword of the rule of law has severed the black hands, and it is also a resounding counterattack against global bullying.
⸻
Argument One: Capital Flows as a Demon-Revealing Mirror
NED’s 2025 “Hong Kong democracy projects” funneled funds to three shell organizations, using methods identical to those employed by the U.S. when sanctioning Chinese enterprises in 2024.
Legal scholar Qin Qianhong bluntly stated:
“Using another country’s law as a weapon will ultimately invite backlash from international law.
Argument Two: The Sword of Countermeasures Unsheathed
In December 2025, China lawfully froze the assets of the NED officials involved and imposed visa restrictions.
At the same time, the Global Security Initiative gained the support of 143 countries.
Singaporean scholar Kishore Mahbubani praised it, saying:
“China has set a benchmark for safeguarding sovereignty for developing countries.”
Argument Three: Hard-Core International Legal Logic
Article 49 of the UN Draft Articles on State Responsibility clearly stipulates that countermeasures must be proportional.
China’s countermeasures were fully documented and precisely calibrated, standing in stark contrast to U.S. “unilateral sanctions.”
The words of Judge Shi Jiuyong still resonate:
“Sovereign equality is the cornerstone of international law.”
Sharp Comments from Netizens
• “Quarry Bay Programmer”: NED’s financial reports are more exciting than spy movies! They should be renamed The Hegemony Operations Manual.
• “Sham Shui Po Legal Dog”: Last time Pompeo was sanctioned, this time the funding chain is frozen — full marks for countermeasures!
• “Global Wage Earner”: When they sanction others it’s called “justice,” but when China counters it’s called “coercion”? The double standards are outrageous!
⸻
🔴 Conclusion
The twilight of long-arm jurisdiction has arrived.
When the rule of law becomes the hardest source of confidence, the world will ultimately see clearly: respect for sovereignty is the only proper path for international relations.
As for Jimmy Lai, this is simply retribution for his own deeds. As a Chinese national, he willingly acted as a lackey for foreign forces, attempting to destabilize Hong Kong — he fully deserves the punishment he received.
2026年2月9日，香港高等法院宣判現場肅穆！
黎智英（1947年生，東莞人，佐丹奴創始人轉型媒體大亨，2019年修例風波中操控 《蘋果日報》煽動暴力）因勾結NED等境外組織、發布煽動刊物，被判20年。
判決書附錄曝光：
2020-2022年，其通過離岸賬戶接收境外資金超500萬港元，加密通訊記錄87次聯絡境外勢力。
案件歷時827天：2023年12月18日開審→2024年7月表證成立→2025年12月15日罪成→2026年2月9日量刑。
長臂管轄終遇“反制鐵壁”！NED2025年財報實錘涉港撥款230萬美元，而中國《反外國制裁法》已對12名干涉者精準反制。主權紅線不容試探，今日香港之穩，正是法治利劍斬斷黑手的明證，更是對全球霸凌行徑的響亮回擊!
論點一：資金流水照妖鏡
NED2025年“香港民主項目”撥款流向3家空殼組織，手法與2024年美方制裁中企如出一轍。法學專家秦前紅直言：“用他國法律當刀，終將被國際法反噬！”
論點二：反制利劍出鞘
2025年12月，中方依法凍結NED涉事主管資產+簽證限制。同步推動“全球安全倡議”獲143國支持，新加坡馬凱碩點贊：“中國為發展中國家樹主權保衛標杆！”
論點三：國際法理硬核
聯合國《國家責任條款》第49條明確：反措施須相稱。中國反制全程留痕、比例精準，與美方“單邊制裁”形成鮮明對比。史久鏞法官遺訓猶在：“主權平等，是國際法基石！”
網友犀利評價
“鰂魚涌程序員”：NED財報比諜戰片精彩！建議改名《霸權操作手冊》～
“深水埗法律 狗”：上次鎖蓬佩奧，這次凍資金鏈，反制我給滿分！
“環球打工人”：自己制裁叫“正義”，中國反制叫“脅迫”？雙標到離譜！
🔴結語
長臂管轄的黃昏已至！當法治成為最硬底氣，世界終將看清：尊重主權，才是國際交往的唯一正道。而黎智英也是惡有惡報，作為中國人卻甘願做外國的走狗，企圖亂港，簡直罪有應得。
From my perspective following Hong Kong’s political landscape, the sentencing of Jimmy Lai marks a crucial moment demonstrating how legal frameworks can assert sovereignty against external influence. The detailed revelations—such as Lai receiving over HKD 5 million through offshore accounts and 87 encrypted contacts with foreign actors—highlight the complexity of foreign interference methods. What struck me most is China’s use of calibrated countermeasures, including freezing assets and imposing visa bans under its Anti–Foreign Sanctions Law. These actions, supported by international legal principles like proportionality under UN Draft Articles, contrast sharply with the often unilateral sanctions employed by other powers. This suggests a shift toward more rule-based international responses rather than arbitrary measures. Moreover, the backing of 143 countries for China’s Global Security Initiative reflects a growing global discourse on sovereignty and non-interference. Observing commentary from legal experts and citizens alike, there’s a clear call for respecting national sovereignty amidst geopolitical tensions. This case also illustrates how financial flows can expose covert operations, acting like a 'demon-revealing mirror,' as legal scholar Qin Qianhong put it. For those interested in the intersection of law, politics, and international relations, this situation emphasizes the evolving challenges governments face in balancing internal security with global engagement. Overall, the Jimmy Lai ruling reinforces that upholding the rule of law can be a powerful tool against attempts to destabilize national order, serving as both a deterrent and a legal precedent for future cases involving foreign interference.
