From my experience and research, life without parole (LWOP) in women's prisons often means inmates face extremely limited time outside their cells, frequently confined for up to 23 hours a day. This practice, sometimes referred to as '23-hour lockdown,' is used as a disciplinary measure or for individuals deemed high-risk, particularly those serving LWOP sentences. Being in such confinement for prolonged periods can severely affect mental health, causing feelings of isolation, anxiety, and depression. It is important to understand that while LWOP ensures the inmate will remain incarcerated for life, the conditions of confinement vary widely depending on the facility and security level. Additionally, general population inmates in women's prisons may have somewhat different daily routines compared to those in segregation or lockdown. Programs like education, work, and social interaction are often limited or unavailable to those confined 23 hours daily. In the case of sentencing, such as the example mentioned with the Richins case, the decision to impose life without parole often comes with the expectation of strict confinement to maintain safety and manage risks within the prison. However, advocates argue for reform to provide more humane treatment and increased access to rehabilitative programs even for those serving life sentences. Understanding these conditions helps shed light on the challenges faced by women in the prison system, emphasizing the need for ongoing discussions about prison policies, mental health support, and the human rights of incarcerated individuals.