Why is Big Brother only watching the poor?

Riddle me this....... Many people have observed a striking imbalance in how surveillance and oversight are distributed in society. Often, disadvantaged individuals and poorer populations face relentless monitoring and scrutiny, while large corporations frequently operate with much less oversight and accountability. This apparent paradox raises important questions about fairness and power dynamics. One reason for this disparity is that poorer populations are generally easier and cheaper to monitor. Technologies such as surveillance cameras, data tracking, and increased policing are often disproportionately deployed in low-income neighborhoods. This increased scrutiny can stem from stereotypes, systemic biases, or political motivations framing these groups as higher risks or more likely to be involved in unlawful activities. In contrast, large corporations wield significant economic and political influence. They often have the resources to lobby against strict regulations or oversight. Regulatory agencies may face challenges due to limited budgets and political pressures that reduce their capacity or willingness to hold powerful entities accountable. Additionally, corporations can be more adept at hiding questionable activities behind complex legal structures. Public perception also plays a role. There can be a cultural narrative that emphasizes individual responsibility over corporate misconduct, shaping attitudes about who deserves scrutiny. Social media and public discourse often highlight personal stories and behaviors, making individual monitoring more visible and emotionally charged than corporate oversight issues. Ultimately, this uneven approach to surveillance raises ethical concerns about privacy, justice, and equality. While security and accountability are important, policymakers and society must critically examine why 'Big Brother' seems more interested in watching the poor and less so in overseeing large corporations. Achieving a fairer balance requires transparency, equitable lawmaking, and an informed public demanding accountability at all levels.