Supreme is interesting.

⚖️ the case before the plaintiff sued the defendant for committing the victim and using the phone to take pictures of the victim naked, possessing images of child pornography, and passing them to another person.

In this case, the plaintiff asks to punish the defendant for trying to rape the victim. The defendant threatens to force the victim to reconcile and associate with the defendant as his lover. If the victim refuses to reconcile, the defendant will take nude porn of the victim that the defendant has taken and has in the defendant's possession and publish it on Facebook.

The act is a different offence and takes place different days and times, and if the case before the court has already been decided, is the right to bring a criminal case against the plaintiff's defendant in the case suspended under Section 39 (4)?

📘 Rule 1343 / 2569, the right to bring a criminal case is suspended when the judgment is completed on the offence indicted, according to the P.D. Section 39 (4) aims at the same offence. The fact that the plaintiff once sued the defendant in a black number criminal case at YCH.45 / 2566, a red number criminal case at YCH.6 / 2567 of the Court of First Instance that the defendant committed the victim in the case and forced the victim to remove the victim's clothes and use his mobile phone to take pictures of the victim while naked and not wearing multiple clothes. The defendant occupied the victim's child pornography image by storing it on the defendant's mobile phone. Later, the defendant forwarded the victim's nudity as child pornography at The defendant has in his possession through several channels through the messenger program to another person several times. In this case, the plaintiff sued the defendant for trying to rape the victim by threatening the victim to reconcile and associate with the defendant as his lover. If the victim does not return to reconcile, the defendant will take the nudity of the victim that the defendant has taken and has in the defendant's possession, which is an offence in the Red Number criminal case that YCH.6 / 2567 of the First Court to publish on Facebook. Although the plaintiff separately sued for the punishment of the defendant in two cases, each of the offenses and each of the other, but the behavior. Both of the defendants are cases in which the defendants acted against the same victim, and the case is based on the same act as the Red Number criminal case at Y.6 / 2567. In the offence of forwarding nudity of the victim of child pornography in the possession of the defendant, so as to intend the victim to reconcile and associate with the defendant as a lover, as the defendant threatened the victim, the defendant's action in the case is an offence of the same offence and is related to the previous case, it is the only offence, so when the act is done, the court has already decided. In the Red Number Criminal Case No. 6 / 2567 of the Court of First Instance, the right to bring a criminal case against the plaintiff's defendant in this case is suspended in accordance with Section 39 (4), Constituting the Juvenile and Family Court and Juvenile and Family Procedure Act, 2010, Article 182 / 1, second paragraph.

🔍 Remarks

In the case of a verdict for an offence indicted, the right to bring a criminal case is suspended (re-indicted). The case before and after must be of the same cause or the same act. The same act means the act of causing liability at the same time, not based on the charge of the offence. If each term is not considered a verdict.

But according to this Supreme Court, the defendant's actions in the case constitute an offence of the same matter, and are intertwined with the continuing intent linked to that in the previous case, as a single offence.

# lawstudents # Jurisprudence # Bar Association # Legal summary # Criminal Procedure Law