Having followed the developments around the Strait of Hormuz escort plan closely, I can share some personal insights on why the shipping industry remains skeptical despite official announcements. Firstly, the commitment to deploying enough naval frigates to effectively secure one of the world’s most critical oil transit chokepoints is challenging. The region is strategically sensitive with multiple geopolitical tensions that could escalate unpredictably. In discussions among maritime professionals, many raise valid doubts over whether the current number of frigates promised can offer tangible protection against fast-moving threats like small boats, mines, or missile attacks. Secondly, when it comes to insurance reliability, shipowners face growing uncertainty. War-risk and political-risk insurance premiums have surged in response to heightened tensions, and there is apprehension about how claims will be handled if a vessel is damaged despite the escort plan. Some insurers have tightened coverage or increased deductibles, raising operational costs and complicating logistics planning. Oil markets reflect these anxieties too. While Trump's escort announcement initially caused a dip in Brent crude prices, the effect was temporary. The recent spike above $84 a barrel indicates underlying concerns that the region remains unstable, thus sustaining the risk premium on oil prices. In my experience, stakeholders in Singapore—one of Asia’s major shipping hubs—are especially watchful. Singapore’s strategic position amplifies the impact of any disruption in the Hormuz Strait, and the local shipping industry closely monitors escort efficacy and insurance frameworks. Ultimately, security guarantees need to be backed by visible, practical capabilities on the water, coupled with clear insurance mechanisms to truly reassure shipowners and stabilize the market.