His full quote -
“If this game applies to and takes away from our resume, I don’t think that’s right,” DeBoer said. “I really don’t. I think the precedent’s been set, and I don’t know how you can go into a conference playoff game and you’re a No. 1 seed and did all these things throughout the year and playing in this game, against one of the top teams in the country as well, how that can hurt you and keep you out of the playoff when we’ve done what we’ve done all year.”
Florida State was left out in 2023 despite their undefeated season?
“Did all these things throughout the year”
The only two top ten teams they beat - Georgia and Oklahoma - they only won by 3 against us and then 2 vs the Sooners. They lost to unranked FSU, struggled against unranked South Carolina, unranked Missouri, and unranked Auburn…
So please somebody on this little app tell me what Alabama has done so great all season that makes this entitled dude think they deserve to go any further?
And while I have your attention - somebody please tell that man to stop acting like he’s built a dynasty. He INHERITED a dynasty. There’s a difference. He is playing Saban’s team. Saban’s recruits. He hasn’t contributed anything and he’s acting like he’s the setting the bar.
I’m all for good hearted rivalry but I swear before Jesus and Kirby Paul Smart that the audacity must come out the damn faucets in the state of Alabama.
The debate surrounding College Football Playoff (CFP) selections often ignites strong opinions, especially when undefeated teams like Florida State are left out. Fans and analysts alike question the criteria that the selection committee uses to choose which teams advance. While being a No. 1 seed or having a strong season is important, it doesn't always guarantee a playoff spot due to strength of schedule, quality wins, and overall team consistency. Florida State’s 2023 season sparked significant controversy because the team went undefeated but faced criticism for their overall schedule strength. Notably, their top ten victories were narrow wins against Georgia and Oklahoma, and they had surprising struggles against unranked teams like South Carolina, Missouri, and Auburn. This inconsistency tends to weigh heavily when committees rank teams for playoffs. On the other hand, Alabama’s position is fiercely defended by some, while others argue theirs is a team built upon a legacy established by previous coach Nick Saban. The notion of inheriting a dynasty versus creating one from scratch resonates deeply in college football culture. Alabama’s current coach benefits from the recruiting pipelines and frameworks established by Saban, but critics claim he has yet to prove himself as the architect of sustained success. Understanding what truly constitutes a dynasty involves looking beyond just wins and losses to evaluate recruiting, player development, and consistent postseason success. Teams like Alabama have set very high standards, but the debate about entitlement versus earned success remains heated. Regardless of where one stands, healthy rivalries and discussions about college football add excitement to the sport. Fans are passionate because these debates touch on pride, tradition, and the future of their teams. Ultimately, the ongoing conversations about playoff fairness and coaching legacies keep the college football community engaged year-round.
