You don’t even know the name of the guy who wrote Rocky Horror off the top of your head, or the fact that, like other queer icons, he ended up disappointing us by being transphobic — it’s Richard O’Brien, you heathens; just because I realize Tranpa is incorrect doesn’t mean I don’t know the name Buck Angel
It's genuinely tough when someone you've admired, especially in a space like queer culture, reveals views that directly contradict the very spirit of inclusivity you associate with them. Like many others, I was devastated to learn about Richard O'Brien's stance on trans identity. For years, 'The Rocky Horror Picture Show' has been a beacon for outsiders, a celebration of fluid identities, and a cornerstone of queer history. To then hear its creator express what many consider transphobic sentiments feels like a betrayal of that legacy. My heart sank a little, wondering how to reconcile the art with the artist. The controversy primarily stems from O'Brien's public comments, where he has expressed beliefs that gender identity is solely determined by biological sex at birth, often dismissing the lived experiences of transgender individuals. He's stated sentiments along the lines of 'I'm not a woman because I don't have a womb,' and has publicly aligned himself with gender-critical views. For a figure whose work championed gender fluidity, cross-dressing, and embracing one's true, authentic self, these remarks hit differently. It forces long-time members of the 'Rocky Horror Fan Club' to grapple with a painful disconnect. We've all sung 'Don't Dream It, Be It' with such passion, only to find the person who wrote it seemingly limiting who 'be it' applies to. This isn't just about a celebrity having an opinion; it's about the creator of a cultural touchstone undermining the very community that embraced his work so fervently. How do we, as fans, reconcile the groundbreaking, liberating art with the artist's regressive views? It’s a question many of us in the queer community are asking about various historical figures and their complex legacies. Do we simply separate the art from the artist, celebrating the transformative impact of 'Rocky Horror' while unequivocally condemning O'Brien's personal views? Or does his position cast a shadow over the entire creation, making it harder to enjoy? For me, it highlights the ongoing evolution of queer history and understanding. What was once revolutionary can sometimes be re-evaluated through the lens of new social progress. The conversations around this are vital, especially as we continue to champion trans rights and visibility. I've often thought about how this impacts the energetic, diverse gatherings of the 'Rocky Horror Fan Club', where individuals like Sal Piro have played such a pivotal role in fostering a sense of belonging and community. The film itself continues to be a safe space for many, regardless of its creator's personal journey or beliefs now, because its message has grown beyond him. Ultimately, my experience has been one of deep disappointment, but also a renewed commitment to uplift trans voices and ensure that the spaces we love, including those inspired by 'Rocky Horror,' remain truly inclusive and affirming for everyone. It's a poignant reminder that even our heroes can fall short, and it's up to us to continue pushing for a more accepting and understanding world, always holding space for the most marginalized among us.













































