From personal observations and extensive debates, it's clear that many people struggle with the idea that reforming a deeply entrenched state system is possible without confronting its fundamental use of violence and control. The phrase 'violence is inherent to the state' highlights that any government maintains power partly through force or coercion, a concept that has been discussed by political theorists like Max Weber. The assertion that the United States functions as a genocidal entity is a powerful critique rooted in historical realities such as colonialism, systemic racism, and military interventions globally. This perspective challenges mainstream political approaches that seek to improve the system without addressing its foundational issues. Moreover, the critique involves a rejection of the idea that Communism can effectively reform such a system, labeling it as a naive or misguided hope akin to certain Democratic approaches. The article implies that reformist politics often fall short when they fail to acknowledge the deep power structures suppressing people. In my experience attending protests and studying political movements, I have seen how deeply ingrained state violence and domination impact marginalized communities particularly harshly. The words from the OCR like 'ANARCHISTS' and 'SUBMIT' resonate in this context, suggesting tensions between submission to authority and the desire to dismantle oppressive systems entirely. This ongoing struggle raises important questions about the limits of political ideology and the nature of power. For those interested in exploring these themes further, diving into anarchist theory and critiques of both capitalism and state socialism can provide valuable insights into alternative ways of organizing society without domination or violence. Ultimately, this article invites readers to critically examine assumptions about state power, reform, and resistance.