From my experiences following social justice movements, it’s clear that demands for corporate reparations are deeply intertwined with government accountability. The reference to Coxey’s Army—a protest movement in the 1890s that sought economic relief during depression—reminds us that citizen activism has long aimed to hold powerful institutions accountable for economic and social injustice. What stands out in recent discussions is the idea that corporations, alongside the government, bear responsibility for ongoing systemic harms, such as the persistence of racial and economic inequalities. The phrase from the OCR content about "allowing for 'sweat equity'" and its connection to violence, including the troubling mention of targeting trans students, highlights how marginalized groups continue to face violence and exclusion while systems protect perpetrators. Additionally, the slogan "We need to give the land back" resonates with Indigenous land rights movements, emphasizing the intersection of reparations with the restoration of ancestral lands. This broadens the scope of reparations beyond financial compensation to include justice in land ownership and sovereignty. Personal observations suggest that true accountability requires dismantling structures that shield those responsible, whether corporations or government entities. Historically, movements like Coxey’s Army have illustrated the power of sustained public pressure in forcing change. Today’s activists build on this legacy, demanding not only reparations but meaningful systemic transformation to address the root causes of injustice. For readers interested in social justice, recognizing the layered demands—from reparations for economic exploitation to protections for vulnerable communities and land restitution—is crucial. These issues are interconnected parts of a larger fight for equity and human dignity, requiring solidarity and persistent advocacy.