If your definition of progressive is “you can transition in the military”, I’m gonna need you to stop right there and examine your internalized imperialism

5/29 Edited to

... Read moreWhen discussing progressivism, it's important to consider how certain narratives might oversimplify complex social and political issues. For instance, framing progress solely in terms of allowing military transition can obscure the larger systemic problems rooted in imperialistic structures. The images referenced in the original article bring to light the paradox of political parties sharing symbols like the American flag and power systems, suggesting that despite apparent differences, they may operate within the same framework. This highlights the necessity of critically examining not only policies but also underlying power dynamics and cultural values. From my experience engaging in conversations about progress, many people focus heavily on surface-level reforms without addressing the foundational issues like how imperialism shapes societal norms and personal identities. Understanding internalized imperialism means recognizing how colonial and dominant power perspectives influence our beliefs and actions, often unconsciously. It challenges us to look beyond institutional changes and question the broader narratives that maintain systemic inequalities. In communities advocating for transformative social change, integrating this critical perspective fosters deeper awareness and more authentic progress. This approach encourages active reflection on how inherited ideologies might perpetuate oppression, even among well-intentioned progressives. Ultimately, meaningful progress involves both policy changes and cultural shifts that dismantle imperialistic mindsets and practices. This makes the discussion more holistic and relevant to those striving for equity on multiple levels.