The human rights of Thai people must come before Khmer.

The Chairman of the National Guard Foundation has expressed his view of the opening tone to pressure Cambodians who have long violated the Thai nation at Nongjan House of Kancho and the attitude of human rights:

"Well, we have to understand what we are doing. What we are doing now is pushing Cambodians who have been encroaching on Thailand, violating human rights in Thailand for decades. Thai people have been invaded and seized the land for decades. I think this is a big principle.

And if you think about human rights, what does it mean? There is a choice between the human rights of the Cambodian people or the human rights of the Thai people. For me, I am Thai and I see that we have been invaded. We have to do everything in every way that allows us to push the Cambodian people out.

For me, as long as there is no use of weapons of war and casualties, there is still a framework and way that we can do it, pressure is one way that can be pushed peacefully. I do not see it as a problem, because it has to choose between the Thai side being violated and he is dormant or he is in trouble and he has to step back to preserve the human rights of the Thai people and the rights of the Thai people. For me, I consider the rights of the Thai people first.

Maybe it affects the well-being of Cambodians, which must be because they invaded Thailand.

We have to uphold the rights of Thai people first, because they are Thai people. Don't forget that this is the Kingdom of Thailand. Thai people have to be protected, help each other protect, so I see that this has to take into account the rights of Thai people before Cambodians. "

As for the human rights perspective, Mr. Panthep said:..

"I look at it differently from the right-leaning because I consider the right to choose between the human rights of the Thai people and the Cambodian people, which cannot coexist. It requires someone to sacrifice and be manipulated in a concrete way, not verbally, because verbally they do not retreat.

We thought someone invaded our house, put it in our fence, and we negotiated for 40 years, and he didn't back down.

I think we have to choose between the human rights of Thais or Cambodians, so I see that there may be a problem, a violation of the rights of Cambodians, but he violates the more serious thing: he violates the human rights of Thais, which must be dealt with first, so I see that the framework is done, I do not object. "

"I understand that they uphold the human rights of the whole country of the whole world, this is the visibility of human rights people, I understand, but in this case it is different that Thais, if they uphold the human rights of Cambodians, will still violate the human rights of Thais.

Thai people do not have the right to eat, cannot enter, even if their area has the right documents, but they are violated, and the side is armed, and there are constant violations.

Importantly, it was an area where the Thai people were merciful to help Cambodians who were troubled by the Khmer Rouge fighting and were afflicted by the Thai people, but were ungrateful.

I think that in this case, Thai people have to find a way to deal with it in every way. And don't forget, they use civilian tactics to make Thai people dare not do anything in invading Thailand.

Your movement on behalf of civilians is about the people, what are you going to say? The state is still dormant. I think now you will pressure each other, and you will cancel it is about you, but I consider the human rights of Thais before Cambodians. "

# TheStructure

# TheStructureNews

# Pantheon Phatthong Pong # Gun power # Thai border, Cambodia