Proof Golfing

#fyp I am the #inventor of it'stianity. A #religion that makes all others viable. I am #God of my own Fate. I create all my own Gods & Godesses. I also create my own Demons, Angels and Djinn, to serve me at my own will. I am God of All #Hearts Worldwide

2025/4/11 Edited to

... Read moreDonald Trump's presidency has been marked by numerous golf outings, which have sparked significant public debate regarding the financial implications for taxpayers. Various reports indicate that Trump has used his private golf courses extensively, with Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington estimating that the Secret Service has spent close to $2 million at Trump-owned properties. During his first term, Trump made an astonishing 547 visits to these locations, including 145 trips to Mar-a-Lago and 328 visits to his golf courses. The Government Accountability Office reported expenses exceeding $13 million just for four specific trips to Mar-a-Lago, including the costs of flying Air Force One and the associated security arrangements. Taxpayers have had to cover significant security expenses, with estimates suggesting they have paid up to $240,000 daily for local law enforcement support during Trump's visits. As debates continue over ethics in government, Trump's pattern of golfing has been criticized not only for its financial burden on taxpayers but also for the potential conflicts of interest arising from his failure to divest from his business empire. This scenario draws stark comparisons to previous presidents who maintained a more traditional approach to their public duties. Furthermore, recent analyses indicate that Trump's second-term golfing excursions have tallied costs surpassing $26 million, revealing a trend of substantial government spending tied to personal leisure activities. Political scrutiny remains high as both the public and watchdog organizations demand transparency regarding how presidential costs are managed and justified. The issue of Trump's golfing habits encapsulates broader concerns about executive accountability and government spending, raising fundamental questions about the responsibilities of public officials and the ethical standards expected from them in office.