Automatically translated.View original post

Why is Twin Flame so elusive for inexperienced people here?

Many people, when hearing the term "Twin Flame," often think of unprovable mysteries, supernatural, angels, invisible energy, or predestination, but if viewed in another way, the Twin Flame concept can be described psychologically, inner growth, and human mental development without necessarily relying on the supernatural at all.

Twin Flame may be a "spiritual language" used to speak of inner growth.

In psychology, there are very similar ideas, such as

Shadow Work

Remedies of childhood wounds

Individuation

Self-awakening

Attachment Theory

What people in the Twin Flame industry call

> "The other side is a mirror, reflecting us."

Psychologically, it could be translated as

> "Some types of relationships make us see the hidden side of ourselves."

There is therefore no need to explain it with supernatural forces.

---

Why do many people feel it's like a supernatural story?

Because the resulting experience is often more intense than a typical relationship.

For example,

Feels strangely familiar.

Feel very deeply linked.

Was violently emotionally aroused.

Life changes after meeting.

But in brain and psychology,

When humans meet people who provoke both love, hope, fear and wounds simultaneously,

The brain will create a very meaningful experience.

Until feeling that

> "This is not common."

---

So why are people so elusive?

1. Most people learn love in relationship style.

People generally view

Love = dating

Love = marriage

Love = having a partner

But the Twin Flame concept says

> Love is an inner change.

So it's a different view.

---

2. Language in the spiritual circle is abstract.

Words like

Energy

Awakening to know

Frequency

Spiritual

Connection

Is an intangible word.

People who are familiar with rational thinking feel that

> "Listen, don't know."

Like explaining the beauty of music to people who have never listened to music.

---

3. Inner experience cannot be passed on entirely.

Suppose one meditates and then a deep peace occurs.

He can tell.

But people will not understand as much as people who have touched themselves.

The Twin Flame concept is similar.

Many people believe that they have to go through some experience to understand what they are talking about.

---

4. There is a lot of mixed information.

On the Internet, several varieties of Twin Flame are described.

Some emphasize internal growth.

Some focus on mysteries.

Some emphasize prediction.

Some emphasize angel numbers.

When everything is mixed, the outside is confused.

---

If cutting out the supernatural, what's left of Twin Flame?

Left with the simple idea that

> "There are certain types of relationships that come to change us deeply."

That person may make us

Know yourself more.

Saw the wounds in my heart

Learn forgiveness.

Love yourself more

Grow into a better person.

Which is what actually happens in human life.

Without the need to prove energy or the supernatural.

---

The essence that many people overlook.

When all the vocabulary is removed,

Both

Twin Flame

Soulmate

Karma

Awakening

Finally, there may only be one question left.

> "What is this relationship teaching about ourselves?"

If the answer is

Teach to love yourself

Teach to forgive

Teach to grow

Teach to reduce ego

Teach to understand others

Whether or not to call it Twin Flame, these lessons are still valuable, and one that any human can learn in real life.

So in a neutral view, Twin Flame may not necessarily be seen as supernatural, but it can be seen as a "spiritual language" used to describe the inner growth process of man through relationships that have a profound impact on life itself.

# Twin Flame

6/19 Edited to

... Read moreāđƒāļ™āļŠāļĩāļ§āļīāļ•āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļ§āļīāļ™āđ€āļŸāļĨāļĄāļĄāļąāļāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ—āđ‰āļēāļ—āļēāļĒāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāļœāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļ„āļĒāļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ•āļĢāļ‡āļāļąāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļąāļĄāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āđŒāļŠāļ™āļīāļ”āļ™āļĩāđ‰ āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļĄāļąāļ™āđ„āļĄāđˆāđƒāļŠāđˆāđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āđāļ„āđˆāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļąāļāđāļšāļšāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļ”āļēāđāļ•āđˆāđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļžāļąāļ™āļāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđāļ›āļĨāļ‡āļ āļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļˆāļīāļ•āđƒāļˆāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĨāļķāļāļ‹āļķāđ‰āļ‡āđāļĨāļ°āļ‹āļąāļšāļ‹āđ‰āļ­āļ™ āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ„āļ™āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ›āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļ§āđˆāļēāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļąāļāļŦāļĄāļēāļĒāļ–āļķāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļĄāļĩāļ„āļđāđˆāļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļāļēāļĢāđāļ•āđˆāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™ āđāļ•āđˆāļ—āļ§āļīāļ™āđ€āļŸāļĨāļĄāļāļĨāļąāļšāļŠāļĩāđ‰āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ§āđˆāļēāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļąāļāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āļ„āļ·āļ­āļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ•āļīāļšāđ‚āļ• āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĩāđˆāļˆāļ°āļĢāļąāļāđāļĨāļ°āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ­āļ āļąāļĒāļ•āļ™āđ€āļ­āļ‡ āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ–āļķāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļœāļŠāļīāļāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāļāļąāļšāļšāļēāļ”āđāļœāļĨāļ āļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ‹āđˆāļ­āļ™āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆ āļˆāļēāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļ™āļŦāļĨāļēāļĒāļ„āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ„āļĒāļŠāļąāļĄāļœāļąāļŠāļāļąāļšāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļąāļĄāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āđŒāđāļšāļšāļ—āļ§āļīāļ™āđ€āļŸāļĨāļĄ āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļēāļžāļ§āļāđ€āļ‚āļēāļĄāļąāļāļˆāļ°āļĢāļđāđ‰āļŠāļķāļāļ–āļķāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĄāđ‚āļĒāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĨāļķāļāļ‹āļķāđ‰āļ‡āļˆāļ™āļĒāļēāļāļˆāļ°āļ­āļ˜āļīāļšāļēāļĒāļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ„āļģāļžāļđāļ” āļšāļēāļ‡āļ„āļĢāļąāđ‰āļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āļŠāļķāļāļ„āļļāđ‰āļ™āđ€āļ„āļĒāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĄāđ‚āļĒāļ‡āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāļĢāļļāļ™āđāļĢāļ‡ āļžāļĢāđ‰āļ­āļĄāļāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĨāļļāļāđ€āļĢāđ‰āļēāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđāļ›āļĨāļ‡āļ—āļēāļ‡āļˆāļīāļ•āđƒāļˆ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļĢāļ°āļŦāļ™āļąāļāļĢāļđāđ‰āļ•āļąāļ§āđ€āļ­āļ‡ (Self-awareness) āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļœāļŠāļīāļāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļēāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļĒāļĩāļĒāļ§āļĒāļēāļšāļēāļ”āđāļœāļĨāđƒāļ™āļ§āļąāļĒāđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ (Shadow Work) āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āđƒāļŠāđ‰āđ€āļ§āļĨāļēāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļāļĨāđ‰āļēāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļœāļŠāļīāļāļŦāļ™āđ‰āļē āļ­āļĩāļāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ—āļ§āļīāļ™āđ€āļŸāļĨāļĄāļĒāļēāļāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆ āļ„āļ·āļ­āļāļēāļĢāđƒāļŠāđ‰āļ āļēāļĐāļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ™āļēāļĄāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāđƒāļ™āļ§āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ āļ„āļģāļ§āđˆāļē "āļžāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™" "āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļ·āđˆāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰" āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­ "āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĄāļ•āđˆāļ­" āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļĄāļąāļāļˆāļ°āđ„āļĄāđˆāļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āļ§āļąāļ”āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļžāļīāļŠāļđāļˆāļ™āđŒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđƒāļ™āļ—āļēāļ‡āļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒ āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļœāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļ™āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļīāļ”āļ§āļīāđ€āļ„āļĢāļēāļ°āļŦāđŒāđāļšāļšāđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļœāļĨāļĢāļđāđ‰āļŠāļķāļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŦāļĨāđˆāļēāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļĒāļēāļāļˆāļ°āļĢāļąāļšāļĢāļđāđ‰ āļ™āļ­āļāļˆāļēāļāļ™āļĩāđ‰ āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ āļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļāļīāļ”āļāļąāļšāđāļ•āđˆāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ™āļāđ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ­āļēāļˆāļ–āđˆāļēāļĒāļ—āļ­āļ”āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ—āļąāđ‰āļ‡āļŦāļĄāļ” āļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļšāļēāļ‡āļ„āļ™āļˆāļķāļ‡āļĢāļđāđ‰āļŠāļķāļāļ§āđˆāļēāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđāļ—āđ‰āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āļˆāļ™āļāļ§āđˆāļēāļˆāļ°āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļŠāļąāļĄāļœāļąāļŠāļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ•āļ™āđ€āļ­āļ‡ āļœāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļ™āđƒāļˆāđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļ§āļīāļ™āđ€āļŸāļĨāļĄāļ„āļ§āļĢāļžāļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āļēāļ§āđˆāļēāđāļ—āđ‰āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§āļĄāļąāļ™āļ„āļ·āļ­ "āļ āļēāļĐāļēāļ—āļēāļ‡āļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļāļāļēāļ“" āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļ­āļ˜āļīāļšāļēāļĒāļ–āļķāļ‡āļāļĢāļ°āļšāļ§āļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ—āļēāļ‡āļˆāļīāļ•āđƒāļˆāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ•āļīāļšāđ‚āļ•āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđāļ›āļĨāļ‡āļ āļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļ•āļ™āđ€āļ­āļ‡āļœāđˆāļēāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļąāļĄāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļœāļĨāļāļĢāļ°āļ—āļšāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļĨāļķāļāļ‹āļķāđ‰āļ‡ āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļīāļ”āđƒāļˆāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āļ–āļķāļ‡āļšāļ—āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļŠāļĩāļ§āļīāļ•āļ”āļąāļ‡āļāļĨāđˆāļēāļ§ āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ āļāļēāļĢāļĢāļąāļāļ•āļąāļ§āđ€āļ­āļ‡ āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ­āļ āļąāļĒ āđāļĨāļ°āļĨāļ”āļ­āļąāļ•āļ•āļē āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāļŠāļĢāđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļĒāļ­āļĄāļĢāļąāļšāļ•āļ™āđ€āļ­āļ‡āļĄāļēāļāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āļ™āļģāđ„āļ›āļŠāļđāđˆāļāļēāļĢāļžāļąāļ’āļ™āļēāļ•āļąāļ§āļ•āļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāđāļ—āđ‰āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āđ„āļ”āđ‰āđƒāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļļāļ” āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļ‰āļ°āļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™ āļŦāļēāļāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĄāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āđ€āļĢāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ‡āđ€āļŦāļ™āļ·āļ­āļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļŠāļēāļ•āļīāđāļĨāļ°āļžāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ‡āļēāļ™āļĨāđˆāļ­āļ‡āļŦāļ™āđ„āļ› āđ€āļĢāļēāļˆāļ°āļžāļšāļ§āđˆāļē Twin Flame āļ„āļ·āļ­āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļąāļĄāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļšāļ—āļšāļēāļ—āļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ°āļ—āđ‰āļ­āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āļ•āļ™āđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ›āļĨāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ™āđāļ›āļĨāļ‡āļ āļēāļĒāđƒāļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āđ€āļĢāļēāđ€āļ­āļ‡ āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āļ˜āļīāļšāļēāļĒāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāļĻāļēāļŠāļ•āļĢāđŒāļ—āļēāļ‡āļˆāļīāļ•āļ§āļīāļ—āļĒāļēāđāļĨāļ°āļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļŠāļĩāļ§āļīāļ•āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡ āļāļēāļĢāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāđƒāļ™āļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļ”āđ‡āļ™āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļˆāļ°āļŠāđˆāļ§āļĒāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļœāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĩāđˆāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļšāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ•āļĢāļ‡āļŠāļēāļĄāļēāļĢāļ–āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļ–āļķāļ‡āļĄāļļāļĄāļĄāļ­āļ‡āđƒāļŦāļĄāđˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĨāļķāļāļ‹āļķāđ‰āļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ āđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ•āļĢāļĩāļĒāļĄāļžāļĢāđ‰āļ­āļĄāļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļšāļāļēāļĢāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļ™āļĢāļđāđ‰āļ—āļĩāđˆāļˆāļ°āļĢāļąāļāđāļĨāļ°āđ€āļ•āļīāļšāđ‚āļ•āļˆāļēāļāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļąāļĄāļžāļąāļ™āļ˜āđŒāđƒāļ™āļŠāļĩāļ§āļīāļ•āļˆāļĢāļīāļ‡āđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ”āļĩāļĒāļīāđˆāļ‡āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™