Automatically translated.View original post

Can a monk take a picture with a Lambo like this? 🏎ïļðŸ§˜â€â™‚ïļ

Can a monk take a picture with a lambo like this? 🏎ïļðŸ§˜â€â™‚ïļ

During this period of social smoldering, a portrait was taken with a live-colored Lamborghini car, causing many to wonder, "Is this appropriate?" "Can the monk shoot with a luxury car?"

This point immediately became a big thread because it was sensitive about society's expectations of gender.

The truth is that "monks are not prohibited from taking pictures with cars" if the situation does not convey possession, boasting of property, or involving extravagance.

Many times, monks may just walk by, have relatives ask to take, or be invited to a merit event at a place where there is already a luxury car.

But what makes people suspicious isn't the only photo.

But it's more "the feeling that image sends out."

Because in the eyes of Buddhists, monks should look simple, perfect, and far away from luxury, so the Lambo duo makes many people question the usual Thai society.

However, there are netizens on the other side.

Don't be quick to judge just for seeing a few seconds.

Because the real-life context may not be the same as it seems, for example, it may be a relative's car, it may be the place where the monk went to the ceremony, or it may have been asked to make a point.

Finally, this point clearly reflects that -

Society expects a "monk's image" dozens of times higher than the average person.

And just one picture could cause an instant debate.

But in any way, the most important thing is "intent" and "decency" rather than what appears in the picture. 🙏

# Unlockmen # Club, man

# Man problem # Trending # Men take care of themselves

2025/11/14 Edited to

... Read moreāđƒāļ™āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāđ„āļ—āļĒ āļžāļĢāļ°āļŠāļ‡āļ†āđŒāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ•āļąāļ§āđāļ—āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļ‡āļš āđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļšāļ‡āđˆāļēāļĒ āđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļĄāļ–āļ° āļ”āļąāļ‡āļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™āđ€āļĄāļ·āđˆāļ­āļĄāļĩāļ āļēāļžāļžāļĢāļ°āļ–āđˆāļēāļĒāļĢāļđāļ›āļ„āļđāđˆāļāļąāļšāļĢāļ–āļĨāļąāļĄāđ‚āļšāļĢāđŒāļāļīāļ™āļĩāļŦāļĢāļđāļŦāļĢāļē āļāđ‡āļĒāđˆāļ­āļĄāđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ„āļģāļ–āļēāļĄāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļ–āļāđ€āļ–āļĩāļĒāļ‡āļāļąāļ™āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āļāļ§āđ‰āļēāļ‡āļ‚āļ§āļēāļ‡ āđ€āļžāļĢāļēāļ°āļ āļēāļžāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļĢāļ°āđƒāļ™āđƒāļˆāļ›āļĢāļ°āļŠāļēāļŠāļ™āļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ›āļĄāļąāļāļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļĢāļĩāļĒāļšāļ‡āđˆāļēāļĒāđāļĨāļ°āļŦāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ„āļāļĨāļˆāļēāļāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŸāļļāđ‰āļ‡āđ€āļŸāđ‰āļ­ āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ„āļĢāļāđ‡āļ•āļēāļĄ āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļąāļ”āļŠāļīāļ™āļ āļēāļžāļ–āđˆāļēāļĒāđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļŠāļąāđˆāļ§āļ„āļĢāļēāļ§āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāļšāļĢāļīāļšāļ—āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļœāļīāļ”āđ„āļ”āđ‰ āļ•āļąāļ§āļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļŠāđˆāļ™ āļĢāļ–āļĨāļąāļĄāđ‚āļšāļĢāđŒāļāļīāļ™āļĩāļ­āļēāļˆāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļ•āļīāđ‚āļĒāļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāđ€āļŠāļīāļāļžāļĢāļ°āđ„āļ›āļ—āļģāļžāļīāļ˜āļĩāļšāļ§āļŠ āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļ‡āļēāļ™āļšāļļāļāļ•āđˆāļēāļ‡ āđ† āļŠāļ–āļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļšāļēāļ‡āđāļŦāđˆāļ‡āļ­āļēāļˆāļĄāļĩāļĢāļ–āļŦāļĢāļđāļˆāļ­āļ”āļ­āļĒāļđāđˆāđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āđ€āļāļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļšāļžāļĢāļ°āđ‚āļ”āļĒāļ•āļĢāļ‡ āļĢāļ§āļĄāļ–āļķāļ‡āļ­āļēāļˆāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđāļ„āđˆāđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļžāļĢāļ°āļ–āļđāļāļ‚āļ­āļ–āđˆāļēāļĒāļĢāļđāļ›āđ‚āļ”āļĒāđ„āļĄāđˆāđ„āļ”āđ‰āļ•āļąāđ‰āļ‡āđƒāļˆāđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ‚āļąāļ”āđāļĒāđ‰āļ‡ āļŠāļīāđˆāļ‡āļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢāļžāļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āļēāļ„āļ·āļ­ āđ€āļˆāļ•āļ™āļēāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļĢāļ°āđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāđƒāļ™āļšāļĢāļīāļšāļ—āļ”āļąāļ‡āļāļĨāđˆāļēāļ§ āļŦāļēāļāđ„āļĄāđˆāļĄāļĩāđ€āļˆāļ•āļ™āļēāļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ–āļķāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāđ‚āļ­āđ‰āļ­āļ§āļ”āļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļāļēāļĢāļ„āļĢāļ­āļšāļ„āļĢāļ­āļ‡āļ—āļĢāļąāļžāļĒāđŒāļŠāļīāļ™ āļ‚āđ‰āļ­āļžāļīāļžāļēāļ—āļ™āļĩāđ‰āļāđ‡āļ­āļēāļˆāđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āđ€āļžāļĩāļĒāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ•āļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļˆāļēāļāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āļŠāļķāļāđ„āļĄāđˆāļŠāļšāļēāļĒāđƒāļˆāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ•āđˆāļ­āļ āļēāļžāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļĢāļ°āļŠāļ‡āļ†āđŒ āļ­āļĩāļāļ”āđ‰āļēāļ™āļŦāļ™āļķāđˆāļ‡ āđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļĒāļąāļ‡āļŠāļ°āļ—āđ‰āļ­āļ™āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļŦāđ‡āļ™āļ–āļķāļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ§āļēāļ‡āļĄāļēāļ•āļĢāļāļēāļ™āļ—āļĩāđˆāļŠāļđāļ‡āļ•āđˆāļ­āļ āļēāļžāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āđŒāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļžāļĢāļ°āļŠāļ‡āļ†āđŒāđƒāļ™āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāđ„āļ—āļĒ āļ—āļĩāđˆāļĄāļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāđāļĨāļ°āļ„āļēāļ”āļŦāļ§āļąāļ‡āđƒāļ™āđāļšāļšāđ€āļ”āļĩāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļ™āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āļ­āļēāļˆāļ—āļģāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļžāļĢāļ°āļŠāļ‡āļ†āđŒāļ•āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļĢāļ°āļĄāļąāļ”āļĢāļ°āļ§āļąāļ‡āđƒāļ™āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļēāļāļāļ•āļąāļ§āđƒāļ™āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāļ—āļąāđˆāļ§āđ„āļ›āļĄāļēāļāļāļ§āđˆāļēāļ„āļ™āļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄāļ”āļē āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āđƒāļŦāđ‰āđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ”āļĩāļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™ āļ„āļ§āļĢāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļ āļēāļžāļĢāļ§āļĄāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āđ€āļŦāļ•āļļāļāļēāļĢāļ“āđŒ āđ„āļĄāđˆāļĒāļķāļ”āļ•āļīāļ”āļāļąāļšāļ āļēāļžāđ€āļ”āļĩāđˆāļĒāļ§ āđ† āđāļĨāļ°āļžāļīāļˆāļēāļĢāļ“āļēāļˆāļēāļāđ€āļˆāļ•āļ™āļēāđāļĨāļ°āļšāļĢāļīāļšāļ— āļžāļĢāđ‰āļ­āļĄāļŠāļ™āļąāļšāļŠāļ™āļļāļ™āđƒāļŦāđ‰āļĄāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ·āđˆāļ­āļŠāļēāļĢāđāļĨāļ°āļ—āļģāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđˆāļēāļ‡āļžāļĢāļ°āļŠāļ‡āļ†āđŒāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄ āđ€āļžāļ·āđˆāļ­āļ›āđ‰āļ­āļ‡āļāļąāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāđƒāļˆāļœāļīāļ”āđāļĨāļ°āļĨāļ”āļāļēāļĢāļ‚āļąāļ”āđāļĒāđ‰āļ‡āļ—āļĩāđˆāļ­āļēāļˆāđ€āļāļīāļ”āļ‚āļķāđ‰āļ™āļˆāļēāļāļ āļēāļžāļ–āđˆāļēāļĒāļ—āļĩāđˆāļ•āļĩāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļ•āļēāļĄāļ­āļēāļĢāļĄāļ“āđŒāļŦāļĢāļ·āļ­āļ āļēāļžāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļ“āđŒāļžāļ·āđ‰āļ™āļāļēāļ™āļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāđ€āļ—āđˆāļēāļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™ āļ”āļąāļ‡āļ™āļąāđ‰āļ™ āļĄāļļāļĄāļĄāļ­āļ‡āļ•āđˆāļ­āļ āļēāļžāļžāļĢāļ°āļ–āđˆāļēāļĒāļĢāļđāļ›āļāļąāļšāļĢāļ–āđāļĨāļĄāđ‚āļšāļĢāđŒāļāļīāļ™āļĩāļ™āļĩāđ‰āļˆāļķāļ‡āđ„āļĄāđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢāļ–āļđāļāļ•āļąāļ”āļŠāļīāļ™āļ”āđ‰āļ§āļĒāļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđ‰āļŠāļķāļāļ­āļĒāđˆāļēāļ‡āđ€āļ”āļĩāļĒāļ§ āđāļ•āđˆāļ„āļ§āļĢāđƒāļŦāđ‰āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļģāļ„āļąāļāļāļąāļšāļˆāļĢāļīāļĒāļ˜āļĢāļĢāļĄ āđ€āļˆāļ•āļ™āļē āđāļĨāļ°āļšāļĢāļīāļšāļ—āļ‹āļķāđˆāļ‡āđ€āļ›āđ‡āļ™āļŦāļąāļ§āđƒāļˆāļŦāļĨāļąāļāļ‚āļ­āļ‡āļāļēāļĢāļ›āļĢāļ°āđ€āļĄāļīāļ™āļ„āļ§āļēāļĄāđ€āļŦāļĄāļēāļ°āļŠāļĄāđƒāļ™āļŠāļąāļ‡āļ„āļĄāļ›āļąāļˆāļˆāļļāļšāļąāļ™