Review: Gown shirt with blood cowlðĐļ
âïļ Author: Mikito Shinen
âïļ Translator: Pure Pen, District Gun
ð HUMMING BOOKS
âĻ The cover claim, 'The # 1 Book' that readers across Japan 'most want to read', isn't enough to knife the claim that this is a masterpiece of medical investigative fiction on 'Perfect Crime' that readers can't guess' Who is the killer? 'ðēðē Interesting.
ðĐļ Synopsis: 'Saeki Yuya,' a young surgeon who was involved in a case he wholeheartedly believed was' murder 'when a candidate for professor at Junsei Medical University gradually died one by one, and one of the victims was' Saeki Shinya, 'his hated father, and Shinya was also' in surgery, 'where he was an assistant surgeon...What exactly happened??
ðĐļ patient's death during surgery can happen if it is a major surgery, high risk, but Shinya underwent a simple persecution of 'gallstones' and got 'Ebisawa', the surgeon of the hand of the god, and how did Shinya die? So the story of Yuya's investigation began in doubt here.
ðĐļ three candidates for the professorship - Mabuji Kohe, 'Saeki Shinya' and 'Kawana Jun' - while investigating the cause of his father's death, suspects began to surface and gradually 'die' as well. Not only that, the center of the whole story pointed to 'Matsumoto Tatsuo,' a crafty freelance journalist, but!!!He pushed again. ðą
ðĐļ 'Saeki Yuya' got lost in the maze, where there was still a marriage barrier for his sister 'Saeki Manami' that he had to help fix with the illness of 'Saeki Yuko', a mother who was battling terminal cancer...Which will also jigsaw a new piece of evidence from the 'origin' of 'Saeki Yuya' and the sorcerer - a fox glyphs into Yuya's real grandmother that made the 'Saeki' family the sin of the village and led to the 'banishment' of Saeki, the father, from the village...Forever.
âĻ What a drug sign:
1ïļâĢ, the story may have told you a little bit of a motor story than Yuya fumbled into a clue, played us many 'yawns', but in the middle of the story, here!! Speed reading almost minutes per minute, barely turning the page of the book. ð
2ïļâĢ a lot of characters in the story, but!! Everyone has a bond, so entangled that they can't be abandoned. The puzzle knot lures the reader to be fooled until the head pricks...Sigh! Even though I've read a lot of this genre, I'm still 'guessing wrong'. Writers can fool me like ghosts. Clap your hands. ð
3ïļâĢ because it's a medical investigation - the jargon is so tight that sometimes you're thinking about reading a novel or a medical book!!!But believe me, it's not hard to get a lot of new knowledge on your head, especially Huntington's disease.
4ïļâĢ The core of this novel is' medical investigation, 'but the stacked secondary lines of' mother-in-law problem 'and' ancient vernacular belief 'charm us and create' satisfaction 'for us almost more than the crux of the case...Oh!! I don't believe it. ðð
5ïļâĢ Finally, 'The love of parents is always great.' âĪïļâĪïļ
âĻ score: 4.5/5 At first it was only 4 because it was almost asleep to reach 'fun', but it was back!! Then it was too long, and most importantly, it was added to the scene where 'Saeki Manami' hit her mother-in-law.!!Take it for another 0.5. The tough lady must be like this. ðð Oh!! The translator is doing a great job. This is ðððð
# Japanese investigative fiction # Drug sign with lemon8 # Review # Trending # Books to read
āļāļīāļĒāļēāļĒ "āđāļŠāļ·āđāļāļāļēāļ§āļāđāļāļąāļāļāļēāļ§āđāļĨāļ·āļāļ" āļāļ·āļāđāļāđāļāļāļēāļāļŠāļ·āļāļŠāļ§āļāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļāļĒāđāļāļĩāđāļāđāļēāļāļīāļāļāļēāļĄāļĄāļēāļ āđāļāļĢāļēāļ°āļāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļ°āļĄāļĩāļāļĨāđāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļĢāļīāļĻāļāļēāđāļāđāļĢāļāļāļĒāļēāļāļēāļĨāļāļĩāđāđāļāđāļĄāđāļāļāđāļ§āļĒāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĨāļķāļāļĨāļąāļāđāļĨāđāļ§ āļĒāļąāļāļŠāļ°āļāđāļāļāļāļąāļāļŦāļēāļāļĩāļ§āļīāļāļāļĢāļīāļāđāļāļ§āļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļāļĒāđāđāļĨāļ°āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļŠāļąāļĄāļāļąāļāļāđāđāļāļāļĢāļāļāļāļĢāļąāļ§āđāļāđāļāļĒāđāļēāļāļĨāļāļāļąāļ§ āļāļēāļāļāļĢāļ°āļŠāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļēāļ āļāļĄāļĢāļđāđāļŠāļķāļāļ§āđāļēāļŠāļīāđāļāļāļĩāđāļāļģāđāļŦāđāļāļīāļĒāļēāļĒāđāļĢāļ·āđāļāļāļāļĩāđāļāđāļēāļŠāļāđāļāđāļĄāđāđāļāđāđāļāđāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĨāļļāđāļāļĢāļ°āļāļķāļāļāļāļāļāļāļĩ āđāļāđāļĒāļąāļāļĄāļĩāļĢāļēāļĒāļĨāļ°āđāļāļĩāļĒāļāđāļāļĩāđāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļāļĒāđāļāļĩāđāļāļđāļāļāļāļīāļāļēāļĒāļāļĒāđāļēāļāđāļāđāļēāđāļāļāđāļēāļĒ āļĢāļ§āļĄāļāļąāđāļāļāļēāļāļāļĩāđāļŠāļ°āļāđāļāļāļāļķāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļāđāļāļāļ§āļāļāļāļāļāļĢāļāļāļāļĢāļąāļ§āļāļēāđāļāļāļīāļāļķāđāļāļĄāļĩāļāļĄāļĨāļķāļāļāđāļāļ āđāļāđāļ āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļąāļāđāļĒāđāļāļāļąāļāļāđāļāļāļĩāđāđāļŠāļĩāļĒāļāļĩāļ§āļīāļāļāļĨāļēāļāļāđāļēāļāļąāļ āļāļēāļĢāđāļāļāļīāļāļŦāļāđāļēāļāļąāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļāļ·āđāļāđāļāļĢāļēāļ āđāļĨāļ°āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļąāļāļāļĩāđāļĒāļīāđāļāđāļŦāļāđāļāļāļāļāđāļāđāļĄāđ āļāļąāđāļāļŦāļĄāļāļāļĩāđāļāļģāđāļŦāđāđāļāļ·āđāļāđāļĢāļ·āđāļāļāļĄāļĩāļĄāļīāļāļī āđāļĄāđāđāļāđāđāļāđāđāļĢāļ·āđāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļēāđ āđāļāļĒāđāļāļāļēāļ°āļāļąāļ§āļĨāļ°āļāļĢ "āļāļēāđāļāļāļī āļĒāļđāļĒāļ°" āļāļĩāđāļĢāļąāļāļāļāđāļāđāļāļĻāļąāļĨāļĒāđāļāļāļĒāđāđāļĨāļ°āļāļąāļāļŠāļ·āļāđāļāļāļĢāļēāļ§āđāļāļĩāļĒāļ§ āđāļāļēāļāđāļāļāđāļāđāļāļĢāļīāļĻāļāļēāđāļāļāļāļ°āļāļĩāđāļāđāļāļāļĢāļąāļāļĄāļ·āļāļāļąāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļāđāļāļāļ§āļāļāļēāļāđāļāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļāļēāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāđāļāļāļĢāļāļāļāļĢāļąāļ§ āļāļģāđāļŦāđāđāļĢāļēāđāļāđāđāļŦāđāļāļāļąāđāļāđāļāđāļĄāļļāļĄāļāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļāđāļāļĄāļāļļāļĐāļĒāđāđāļĨāļ°āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļļāđāļĄāđāļāđāļāļāļēāļāļĩāļ āļāļāļāļāļēāļāļāļĩāđ āļŦāļāļąāļāļŠāļ·āļāđāļĨāđāļĄāļāļĩāđāļĒāļąāļāđāļŦāđāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđāđāļŦāļĄāđ āđ āđāļāđāļ āđāļĢāļāļŪāļąāļāļāļīāļāļāļąāļ āļāļķāđāļāđāļāđāļāđāļĢāļāļāļĩāđāļāļĄāđāļĄāđāļāđāļāļĒāļĢāļđāđāļāļąāļāļĄāļēāļāđāļāļ āļāļēāļĢāļāļŠāļĄāļāļŠāļēāļāļĢāļ°āļŦāļ§āđāļēāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļąāļāđāļāļīāļāđāļĨāļ°āļŠāļēāļĢāļ°āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđāļāđāļ§āļĒāđāļāļīāđāļĄāļāļļāļāļāđāļēāļāļāļāļāļīāļĒāļēāļĒāđāļĨāđāļĄāļāļĩāđāļĄāļēāļāļāļķāđāļ āđāļāļ āļēāļāļĢāļ§āļĄ āļāļĄāđāļāļ°āļāļģāđāļŦāđāļāļāļāļĩāđāļāļāļāļāđāļēāļāļāļīāļĒāļēāļĒāļŠāļ·āļāļŠāļ§āļāļŦāļĢāļ·āļāļŠāļāđāļāđāļĢāļ·āđāļāļāļĢāļēāļ§āđāļāļ§āļāļāļēāļĢāđāļāļāļĒāđāļĨāļāļāļāđāļēāļāļāļđāļāļĢāļąāļ āļĢāļąāļāļĢāļāļāļāļ°āļāļīāļāđāļāđāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāļāļąāļāļāđāļāļāļāļāļāļāļāļĩāđāļĨāļ°āļāļēāļĢāļāļđāļāđāļĢāļ·āđāļāļāļāļĩāđāļāļēāļāļāļĨāļēāļāļāļāļāļāļđāđāđāļāļĩāļĒāļ āļĢāļ§āļĄāļāļķāļāļāļĢāļĢāļĒāļēāļāļēāļĻāļāļēāļĢāļŠāļ·āļāļŠāļ§āļāļāļĩāđāļĄāļĩāđāļāļāļĨāļąāļāļĐāļāđāđāļāļāļēāļ°āļāļąāļ§ āļāļĢāļ°āļŠāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļāļĩāđāļāļ°āļāļģāđāļŦāđāļāļļāļāđāļŦāđāļāļ§āđāļē "āđāļŠāļ·āđāļāļāļēāļ§āļāđāļāļąāļāļāļēāļ§āđāļĨāļ·āļāļ" āđāļĄāđāđāļāđāđāļāđāļāļīāļĒāļēāļĒāļāļĢāļĢāļĄāļāļē āđāļāđāđāļāđāļāļāļĨāļāļēāļāļāļīāđāļāđāļāđāļāļāļāļĩāđāļāđāļēāļāđāļĨāđāļ§āđāļāđāļāļąāđāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļāļĨāļīāļāđāļāļĨāļīāļāđāļĨāļ°āļāļ§āļēāļĄāļĢāļđāđāļāļīāļāļāļąāļ§āļāļĨāļąāļāļāđāļēāļ


