The phrase "We love women, let's bomb Iran" captures a critical viewpoint on how women's rights have sometimes been used as justifications for geopolitical actions that ultimately cause harm rather than help. Historically, the United States has supported various regimes in Iran, including the Shah's monarchy and more recent authoritarian governments, often under the guise of promoting democracy or women's rights. However, these political maneuvers frequently prioritized strategic interests and power over genuine support for gender equality. For example, while figures like Mozahed represented liberal democratic reform ideals, US foreign policy often overlooked such leaders in favor of more controllable authoritarian regimes—even when they perpetuated sexism and oppression. This pattern demonstrates how feminism has occasionally been instrumentalized to advance economic or military agendas, rather than purely humanitarian or equalitarian goals. Critics argue that these actions have not only failed to advance women's rights in those regions but have caused destabilization and suffering that disproportionately affects vulnerable populations. Moreover, the scenario in the Middle East and other areas reminds us that true support for feminism must be rooted in respect for the local context and the empowerment of people from within their own culture—not imposed through external force or political agendas. Understanding these complexities is essential to critically analyzing global power dynamics and recognizing that the real forces behind exploitation often stem from money and political control rather than ideological commitments. This nuanced perspective helps us question simplified narratives and encourages more ethical and effective approaches to international solidarity and feminist support.