The ongoing schism in the right wing, particularly between figures like Feuntes and Shapiro, reveals deep ideological divides that are shaping contemporary political discourse. One faction, often associated with Feuntes, emphasizes an unapologetic defense of imperialism and capitalism, maintaining traditional power structures while denying or downplaying their harms. In contrast, the other wing, represented by voices such as Shapiro, increasingly navigates towards overtly fascist tendencies, producing systems that consolidate authoritarianism and marginalize minorities. This split is not merely a political disagreement but a reflection of broader social and economic contradictions. As the neoliberal neoconservative right wing struggles with its declining influence, the emergence of fascist elements underscores a reactionary push against progressive movements and international solidarity. Supporters on both sides use issues like minorities and anti-imperialism as wedge tactics to assert influence and discredit opposing views. Importantly, this divide impacts global politics, with each faction's stance on projects like US imperialism, international alliances, and the control of geopolitical power centers—such as Israel—playing critical roles. The neoliberalist wing seeks to maintain control through international cooperation and economic domination, while the fascist wing embraces exclusionary and authoritarian methods. Recognizing this schism helps clarify why alliances within the right wing are fragile and why solidarity across nations and political groups remains challenging. It is essential to understand that neither faction works in genuine alliance with marginalized communities; instead, they often manipulate these communities for political ends while reinforcing systemic inequities. Ultimately, understanding the right wing divide between Feuntes and Shapiro offers a window into the evolving nature of political reactionism, revealing how denial, reinforcement, and the creation of fascist systems are intertwined in today's socio-political landscape.