Understanding the ongoing conflict requires a clear perspective on power and justice. Often, dominant narratives frame Palestinians as unwilling to compromise, but this perspective fails to account for the realities of oppression and power imbalance. This article highlights how propaganda simplifies complex issues to place undue blame on the oppressed. The phrase "Why don't they compromise?" is frequently used to justify ongoing injustice by implying that one side is obstinate. However, insisting on compromise from those facing deep-rooted inequities can be a form of coercion that denies their right to resist oppression. To truly understand this stance, one must recognize that power should not be used unjustly, and those in power do not have an obligation to use force, but often do, to maintain control. Moreover, the language of compromise often ignores the lived experiences of those affected. When Israelis and their supporters ask Palestinians to compromise, it glosses over the historical and ongoing exclusion, displacement, and physical coercion Palestinians face. Distinguishing between genuine negotiation and demands that maintain structural injustice is crucial. It is important to see beyond simplified propaganda. Debunking these narratives involves recognizing the asymmetrical power relations and the ways propaganda is employed to maintain dominant perspectives. The demand for Palestinians to compromise without addressing these inequities is misleading and unjust. By focusing on the legitimacy of resisting oppression and critically analyzing the narratives used, readers can develop a more nuanced understanding of the conflict. Resisting unjust power is not only justified but necessary for any meaningful path toward peace and justice.