I think many people have considered how bad American intervention is, but not many have considered the long and complicated ways that it is bad
From my personal observations and extensive reading, the influence of American intervention on global democracy is far deeper and more far-reaching than often acknowledged. It's not just about the immediate consequences of military actions or regime changes; the lasting effects ripple through societies in ways that undermine trust, free media, and civil liberties. The continuous presence—or even threat—of American involvement compels many governments to adopt defensive measures that limit political freedoms and censor media, often justified as necessary responses to external interference. This cycle perpetuates a damaging environment where democracy struggles to flourish independently. For example, in countries neighboring those where America has intervened, elections may be questioned or postponed with the reasoning rooted in the fear of external manipulation. Media outlets may receive funding or propaganda from foreign sources, complicating citizens' abilities to discern trustworthy information. The internet, often seen as a space for free exchange, can become a battleground for digital propaganda, leading some nations to impose strict controls or firewalls. What is crucial to understand is that these defensive actions, while often criticized as illiberal or authoritarian, sometimes arise as direct consequences of the 'standing threat' of intervention. The fear and reality of foreign interference shape political and social dynamics in these regions profoundly. Ending or significantly reducing such intervention is therefore not only about stopping physical military involvement but also about dismantling the broader framework of influence that justifies these defensive crackdowns. A world without the standing threat of American intervention could foster more genuine democratic processes and respect for civil liberties globally. Reflecting on these complexities offers important perspectives beyond simplistic critiques of interventionism, urging a more nuanced understanding of how foreign policy shapes global democratic health and the everyday realities of freedom.