In reflecting on the statement that political systems founded on the ratio of other peoples should not exist, it is crucial to consider historical and social contexts. Political legitimacy often comes from the consent and representation of the populations within a state rather than purely demographic ratios. For instance, Israel's complex political landscape involves multiple ethnic and religious groups, and its legitimacy is supported both internationally and internally through various mechanisms including democratic elections, legal frameworks, and international recognition. From personal observation and experience in engaging with discussions on political legitimacy, it becomes clear that reducing the foundation of a political system to simple population ratios can overlook the nuanced realities of governance. Many countries worldwide host diverse populations and maintain political systems that function through inclusive policies or power-sharing agreements. Moreover, it is important to understand the geopolitical history that shapes current political entities. Israel, for example, emerged through a unique historical process involving migration, conflict, and diplomacy. The assertion that a system ‘should not exist’ based solely on demographic ratios omits the broader context of legal establishment, international agreements, and the political will of its inhabitants. Engaging thoughtfully with these topics encourages a deeper appreciation of the complexities involved in state legitimacy and promotes informed dialogue rather than reductive conclusions. Understanding diverse perspectives and factors such as historical claims, social contracts, and international law is essential when analyzing any political system's foundation.