In reflecting on the complex relationship between libertarian rhetoric and its practical application, it becomes evident that what is often promoted as free market principles serves different interests depending on geopolitical context. For example, while Chile under Pinochet claimed to implement free market reforms, the benefits rarely extended beyond the imperial core. Instead, these policies have frequently acted as instruments for resource exploitation and political control. Having observed political shifts in Latin America, it is clear that figures like Argentina's Javier Milei reflect this paradox. Publicly endorsing libertarian policies, they gain support primarily from powerful corporate interests and proxies aligned with imperial agendas, rather than promoting genuine economic freedom for the broader population. This dynamic explains the significant disconnect between libertarianism’s theoretical promises and the lived realities of those outside key economic centers. A critical aspect is that the so-called 'invisible hand' of the market is disrupted or absent in regions burdened by militarization and ongoing conflict, such as Gaza. Here, libertarian ideals about market freedom are overshadowed by state control and imperial interests. This situation starkly contrasts with the privatization and deregulation celebrated within the global core, revealing a double standard in the application of these economic philosophies. From personal observations, the interplay between neoliberal policies and imperial power structures often results in policies that protect oligarchic interests while undermining the sovereignty and welfare of local populations. The framing of libertarianism as a system enhancing freedom clashes with its function as a mechanism of control and resource extraction in many parts of the world. Understanding this helps clarify why some political platforms succeed in garnering empire support despite lacking popular democratic legitimacy. Ultimately, this nuanced perspective challenges us to scrutinize political-economic narratives critically. Recognizing libertarianism’s role as a tool for maintaining imperial influence rather than fostering equitable free markets encourages deeper inquiry into global economic justice and the true beneficiaries of so-called free trade.