Having closely followed the growing debates around the involvement of corporations like GE Aerospace in military conflicts, I find this discussion particularly important. GE Aerospace manufactures and services engines for military aircraft used by various air forces, including those involved in contentious actions in the Middle East. The company’s collaboration with prominent academic institutions, such as Oxford University’s Faculty of Law, raises significant ethical questions. From a personal perspective, I believe universities have a responsibility to consider the impact of their partnerships, especially when linked to companies that may contribute to armed conflict and humanitarian crises. The event hosted by Oxford Law Faculty in collaboration with GE Aerospace, focusing on commercial and legal negotiation workshops, provides valuable professional opportunities but also risks normalizing and legitimizing entities implicated in war-related controversies. This situation underscores a broader issue in higher education and corporate partnerships: balancing educational and professional development benefits with moral and social responsibility. Academic institutions must critically evaluate how their alliances affect their reputation and align with their values. Moreover, public awareness of such partnerships fuels important conversations about the role of education in conflict and peacebuilding. Students and staff alike can use these moments to advocate for more ethical and transparent collaborations that do not undermine peace and human rights. In conclusion, anyone involved in or affected by these discussions should consider both the legal and ethical dimensions of corporate involvement in armed conflicts. Educational forums, while beneficial for skills development, should not overlook the broader consequences of aligning with controversial defense contractors. Encouraging open dialogue and activism within academic contexts can help push for greater accountability and more humane policies.