From my experience following global news and geopolitics, it’s become clear that understanding the concept of proxy states is essential to grasping modern international relations. The UAE, Israel, and Saudi Arabia often act in alignment with US interests, especially in their military actions in the Middle East. These countries typically require the tacit or explicit approval of the US before undertaking significant operations, which positions them as extensions of American foreign policy rather than fully autonomous actors. This dynamic influences how news reports about conflicts—such as bombings in Iran—should be interpreted. Headlines that isolate Israel, Saudi Arabia, or the UAE as the sole actors often miss the bigger picture: that these actions reflect broader US strategic goals. Recognizing this helps avoid mistaken alliances or simplistic views of regional conflicts. Moreover, this perspective sheds light on why certain aggressions, like Israeli actions in Lebanon, are closely linked to American imperial interests rather than isolated incidents. Popular governments or democratic movements in the Middle East often face pushback if they threaten US oil interests or regional dominance. The US tends to support proxy states that maintain its influence and counterbalance powers like Iran. Personally, viewing geopolitical events through the lens of imperial hegemony and proxy state relationships has helped me critically assess news coverage and understand the complexities behind seemingly straightforward conflicts. It also underscores the importance of not taking headlines at face value but considering the underlying strategic motives shaping these actions worldwide.