The occupant of the land and the buyer of the property at auction.

Supreme Court Judgment No. 2021 / 2024

The process of enforcement at various stages, if the creditor of the judgment, the debtor of the judgment, or an external person, the interested person in the enforcement of the case, is corrupted because it deems that the enforcement officer is acting deficiently, erroneously, or in violation of the law, such person shall have the right to petition the court to revoke or amend all enforcement procedures or any particular means of enforcement, or to prescribe any means of enforcement as the court thinks fit. Article 295, second paragraph, is a specifically provided law. When a plaintiff claims that the sale of the disputed land is unlawful because Mr. 1 does not own the real property and the disputed land deed is issued without preference, the plaintiff must apply to the court in the original case or the court that issued the warrant. Section 7 (2) contains Section 271. The plaintiff does not have the power to sue to ask the court for a judgment to revoke the sale of the disputed land at auction as a new case, although the plaintiff's indictment also deals with the issue of revocation of the disputed land title. The executioner is the only executioner to enforce the judgment or order. There is no authority to become a stakeholder or a litigant, so the plaintiff has no power to sue Mr. 5.

Mr. 1 has been entitled to 808 disputed land since the beginning. Although Mr. 1 later sold the disputed land and handed over the possession to the plaintiff, and the plaintiff has occupied the disputed land for about 20 years, but as long as the registration change is not registered, Mr. 1 is still considered to be the name of the disputed land benefit certificate. Mr. 1 also benefits from the assumption of the law as the possessor of the Nov. Section 1373, when it does not appear that Mr. 4 has accepted the disputed land mortgage in bad faith, is protected by the Second Paragraph 1299, as well as that Mr. 6, the buyer of the disputed land at auction, has just learned that there is an argument about the disputed land ownership after Mr. 6 bought the disputed land at auction, so that Mr. 6 is a good-faith buyer of the disputed land at auction by court order. The disputed land rights of Nov 6 are not lost by Nov. Section 1330 Mr. 6 would have better rights to the disputed land than the plaintiff. The case may not be compelled by an application for the return of the disputed land to the plaintiff.